|
Home » Audio » Silicon Valley » Tubes versus Transistors (in 1976)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Tubes versus Transistors [message #95697 is a reply to message #95695] |
Tue, 21 June 2022 22:08   |
positron
Messages: 113
Registered: May 2020
|
Viscount |
|
|
Wayne Parham wrote on Tue, 21 June 2022 08:53
It's an ongoing discussion and I'm always interested.
I remember, when I was a teenager, thinking that vacuum tubes were an interesting historical oddity, firmly superseded by more modern technologies.
I was surprised to learn - much later - that modern vacuum tube amps weren't made purely for nostalgia. They were made for sound quality too.
Don't worry, many over the years have also thought tubes were somewhat an oddity, including my professors. Fortunately, being older I grew up with tubes, and worked on amps and radios since I was 7 or so. (Am I really fortunate??)
Anyway, with the advent of solid state, I had the opportunity of comparing tube amps vs the newly marketed solid state amps of the 60s on. The sonic difference was clear back then. Fortunately, both tube and SS have improved.
As far as inherent differences I will list some, but this will not be an exhaustive list. Some items will be quite elementary, but I mention them for the general public's benefit.
1. Both tubes and transistors have internal capacitances. Triodes have plate to grid, plate to cathode, cathode to grid. Transistors have collector/drain to base/gate, collector/drain to emitter/source, emitter/source to base/gate. (Corresponding to bipolar, fets, hexfrets etc.)
A capacitor consists of two conductive plates/foils and an insulating material/dielectric. The insulating material has dielectric absorption (DA), and foils a series equivalent resistance (ESR). As the musical signal voltage changes, the DA holds on to electrons when it should not. ESR tends to prevent the capacitor from fully discharging when it should. Both are bad.
A. Tubes use a vacuum, thus with basically zero DA.
B. Transistors use a "solid state" material(s) with a much much higher dielectric absorption figure (DA); maybe 500 or more times higher.
2. Tubes have extremely low impedance/resistance terminations to the leads/pins, so the ESR of the internal capacitances are near zero. Solid state has much higher internal termination impedances/resistances, thus a much much higher ESR.
3. Both have Miller capacitance, the gain of stage times the plate to grid capacitance (drain/collector to gate/base capacitance).
Miller capacitance = Av x Cpg.
A. For triodes, the Miller capacitance can amount to up to 150pf, maybe higher in a common cathode gain stage. This capacitance remains relatively constant.
B. Hexfets are a different story. They have their Cdg changing from quite small pf (pico farads) to 1000pf or more for power output Hexfets, depending upon the Vcc drain voltage to source. Even a three amp drain rating has quite high capacitance but fortunately output types are generally source followers with gain of less than one. Bi-polars are much better in this respect.
There are ways to minimize the junction capacitance problem, but that usually means more transistors, thus more associated parts in the circuitry.
4. Number of stages can vary. Generally, I see many more stages, with associated parts, with SS than with tubes. However, I have recently seen a SS amp with just two total stages, the same as some tube amps. (Tube amplifiers can also have several stages, with more associated parts.)
5. Power supply differences.
A. A solid state amplifier works at relatively low voltages and high currents. This means that the power supply filter capacitance has to be huge, generally in the 10s of 1,000s of uf. Large electrolytic capacitors create huge problems with high DA, ESR, higher internal inductance, and lower resonant frequency.
(See article "Picking Capacitors" by Walter Jung and Richard Marsh" for more information.)
B. A tube amplifier works with much higher voltages and much less current. This means that the power supply filter capacitance is a factor less than SS amplifiers. The DA is just as large, but the ESR and inductance is generally much less, as there is much less foil to deal with. The resonant frequency is generally higher.
6. Output to speaker.
A. A tube amplifier generally has an output transformer (OPT). A transformer converts a large musical signal (hundreds of volts) to a smaller signal (like SS outputs produce), and a small musical current (couple of hundreds of milliamps) to a large musical signal (like SS outputs produce) to maximize output power to the speaker. These transformers need to handle a wide range of frequencies in a balanced way, and deal with high voltages. This is not easy but can and has been accomplished.
B. A solid state amplifier generally has no need for an output transformer. They are usually directly coupled to the speaker, thus a possible headache avoided.
7. Longevity concerns.
A. Tubes require a filament and cathode.
B. SS is generally immune, although I have seen a transistor's characteristics change over the years.
8. Integrated circuits (ICs) have a couple of problems.
A. A common voltage source, so frequency dependent signal feedback through the power supply.
B. With so many transistors in a close space, transmission of audio signals from one to another, just like an antenna.
C. The associated internal parts, such as resistors etc, are of questionable quality.
With this information presented, I hope the public has a better knowledge base.
Cheers
pos
ps. I have updated this post so one may wish to re-read it again.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Tubes versus Transistors [message #95856 is a reply to message #95697] |
Tue, 26 July 2022 16:48 |
positron
Messages: 113
Registered: May 2020
|
Viscount |
|
|
For your convenience, here is a link to the article "Picking Capacitors" by Walter Jung and Richard Marsh, Audio Magazine, Feb 1980.
https://milbert.com/Files/articles/Picking_Capacitors_1.pdf
Open the .pdf for the article.
Notice graph B4, the X axis is frequency rising with the arrow pointed right.
The Y axis is Z, the impedance is rising with the arrow pointing up.
From left to right, the line Xc is the capacitive reactance (let's call
it ac resistance). Notice the real capacitor's resistance is
dropping/sloping down until it touches the X axis, zero ac resistance and stays zero resistance to infinity frequency.
That is a perfect capacitor.
However, a real world capacitor is not perfect.
Notice at Rs, the line is curving and then rising, now called XL.
At Rs, the capacitor is actually becoming an inductor/choke, with inductive
reactance (ac resistance) becoming prominent. (However, there is no dc current flowing.)
Now let's go to figure 7. This shows a few electrolytic capacitors and the
Rs frequency. Notice how the line for each capacitor starts to curve at
"Rs" and then rises.
Notice most curvature starts below 1,000 cycles per second, less
than 1khz and all by 10khz. Of course that is well within the audible
range. This is the value of capacitors used in solid state and some tube designs.
Newer capacitors are still quite poor compared to poly type
capacitors. Of course, a very small electrolytic capacitor will not
come close to matching any poly capacitors in figures 9A-D.
I hope this helps in understanding why electrolytic capacitors are not
desirable in any analog electronic components, except well away from the direct musical signal path. This especially includes the decoupling
capacitor next to the plate resistor.
cheers
pos
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Dec 11 15:15:16 CST 2024
|
Posting Rules
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Get a T-Shirt!
