Re: Wide Spread RIAA Phono Stage Inaccuracies by Manufacturers [message #95107 is a reply to message #95105] |
Sat, 22 January 2022 23:27 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/413e0/413e00f5cba1f3b2b5107f9dcfe0ee2b05c7be55" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd0ac/bd0ac06bc0716245c70e1d7ca4a193e4fbe25374" alt="Go to next message Go to previous message" |
positron
Messages: 122 Registered: May 2020
|
Master |
|
|
Strum Drum wrote on Sat, 22 January 2022 19:22What's the reason behind the inaccuracies, though? I read the article and couldn't find the reason that so many models are like this. I saw this bit, - "These errors are due in part to the perpetuation in print of incorrect formulas for the design of the RIAA equalization networks commonly employed." However, I don't understand why it was an issue in the first place. I'm not an engineer, but I just assumed there was a standard that everyone followed.
What Stanley is stating is that the design equations used by the designers/engineers are not correct. It is one thing to calculate a single pole complex math problem, but when multiple poles are needed, very complex math is needed. The designers/engineers did not understand how to perform the correct math.
I surmised that there are equations in general, standard reference, use that are incorrect and were simply copied by many designers/engineers.
Hope this helps. Cheers.
pos
|
|
|