Re: The Ballad of Buster Scruggs [message #89615 is a reply to message #89613] |
Wed, 23 January 2019 10:27 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/413e0/413e00f5cba1f3b2b5107f9dcfe0ee2b05c7be55" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd0ac/bd0ac06bc0716245c70e1d7ca4a193e4fbe25374" alt="Go to next message Go to previous message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b0b8/6b0b8078a953053baa04facec1beff407ed1de69" alt="" |
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18835 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
Quick digression -
You're really lucky to have good internet. Because as you've said, "Never has there been such a choice a viewer can make for so little investment, if they have fast enough internet." You do need fast and reliable internet for video streaming.
I initially resisted all real-time streaming technologies, e.g. VoIP (voice) and video over IP. Because the whole IP protocol is designed to be fault tolerant in a way that precludes real-time signals. The packets can (and will) arrive out of order. They may not ever be lost, but if they're sufficiently delayed, then they are "lost" in the real-time stream because the feed has passed the point in time that the delayed packet was needed.
That's why buffering is so important for a video feed. It delays everything long enough to (hopefully) wait for long-lost packets. Since the video feed isn't really real-time, it can be delayed and treated as though it were a download.
That plus fast internet is a requirement for video streaming.
Live audio and video feeds are still plagued with the lost packets problem. But streaming content is a hybrid approach that isn't really live, more like a download. Still, streaming services need good internet to prevent choppy playback, broken with those annoying "buffering" messages.
- Sorry to digress. Now back to Buster Scruggs and other neat things to watch on Netflix.
|
|
|