Home » Audio » Thermionic Emissions » amp input stage
amp input stage [message #8885] Sat, 09 April 2005 05:42 Go to next message
PakProtector is currently offline  PakProtector
Messages: 935
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Hey-Hey!!!,
How much input impedance( variable with frequency thanks to Miller et Al ), is acceptable?

From the extreme of an amp with a 470kOhm grid leak and a pentode gain stage to a Sakuma-style 845:845 amp or step up TX coupling. The load on the linestage is going to have some effect on the sonics, and will depend on the ability of the pre to drive a difficult load.

So, where is the line in the sand, or is it a broad smudge? Of course cabling can contribute to the capacitive load on the pre....

I suppose one answer would be to use the pre which can drive anything. These are usually either complex or 'spensive.
regards,
Dogulas



Re: amp input stage [message #8886 is a reply to message #8885] Sat, 09 April 2005 06:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
So Doudlas; what is this pre that can drive anything? How much input impedance does Merlin exhibit?

Re: amp input stage [message #8887 is a reply to message #8885] Sat, 09 April 2005 08:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18782
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)

I think it's kinda like friction. If you're trying to lubricate your main bearings, you can't reduce it enough but if you're trying to launch from the lights, you want tires with as much as you can get.

Increase impedance and noise immunity goes down. Reduce impedance and you need more drive from the stage in front, or you'll exceed it and increase distortion.


Re: amp input stage [message #8888 is a reply to message #8886] Sat, 09 April 2005 10:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PakProtector is currently offline  PakProtector
Messages: 935
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Well, the pre that can drive anything is right beside the perfect amp...

At a more practical limit, we have Guinevere.

Merlin is fairly high input Z, basically as set by the grid leak of the driven triode. I think I drew this at 100k, but 47k resistor would be a good suggestion, and less might be even better. The cascode shields the grid in a similar way the screen grid in a pentode does, so we don't have a triode's Cg-a multiplied by Miller capacitance.

I take Wayne's mention of noise resistance as important. If we're going to drive Merlin with a pre like Guinevere, we can probably cut the input grid leak resistor to 20k or less w/o troubles. I am going to get out the Iron and try some of this on my amp as soon as I can.
regards,
Douglas

Re: amp input stage [message #8889 is a reply to message #8888] Sat, 09 April 2005 11:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
Keep us posted. Don't be such a stranger, already!

Re: amp input stage [message #8890 is a reply to message #8885] Mon, 11 April 2005 21:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Steve is currently offline  Steve
Messages: 83
Registered: May 2009
Viscount
Yes, the input capacitance of the amp can be up to 100pf. Cables vary so much. I have seen them as low as 30pf/meter and as high as 475pf/meter.

I try to keep the ICs as low as possible as the tube's miller is pretty much set by the designer.

Hope this helps.
Steve

some test results... [message #8909 is a reply to message #8885] Sun, 17 April 2005 07:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PakProtector is currently offline  PakProtector
Messages: 935
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Hey-Hey!!!,
I removed the 150k grid leak resistors from the input stage of my amp and replaced them with 15k. The 20 cps output Z of my linestage is dictated by its 7.5 uF coupling cap, so a 15:1 ratio of input Z to linestage output Z seemed OK from a filter/freq response POV.

I find the system a bit cleaner now. It's not a big difference, but subtle ones are OK with me at this point. Same type of resistor, a 1/2 watt carbon film from Radio Shack.

After listening for a while, I keep thinking that the change was worth it. A worthwhile deviation from std. practice if a system analysis looks to support the change. I would not suggest trying this if a Dynaco PAS 3 were the linestage. A 12AX7 and .22 uF or so coupling cap is not going to cut it I suspect...
regards,
Douglas



Re: some test results... [message #9017 is a reply to message #8909] Wed, 01 June 2005 20:22 Go to previous message
Steve is currently offline  Steve
Messages: 83
Registered: May 2009
Viscount
"A 12AX7 and .22 uF or so coupling cap is not going to cut it I suspect..."


Correct Douglas.

And even a 10:1 ratio isn't bad unless the output Z of the pre is fairly high. But then the IC and amp input capacitance would be more of a problem.

Take care.
Steve

Previous Topic: Cathode drive
Next Topic: November 2005 Vacuum Tube Valley Southern California Audio Festival
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Nov 03 15:46:36 CST 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest