| Should we mention Phil? [message #78730] |
Fri, 20 December 2013 22:06  |
LuckyLucy
Messages: 46
Registered: December 2013
Location: United States
|
Baron |
|
|
Well, maybe everyone else is already tired of hearing about Phil from Duck Dynasty. But since it seems that you can't go anywhere on the internet today without seeing a Duck Dynasty argument, I thought I'd do my duty, and mention it here.
Did anyone read the original article in GQ? I did. Was anyone else more offended by the language the reporter was using than surprised by what Phil said?
The reporter was using the F-word, and cursing every paragraph. I wonder if he talked that way in front of Phil.
What Phil said about gays and everything else was perfectly predictable, given that he's a bible-Christian from Louisiana. What's the uproar? Who was expecting him to say anything different?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Should we mention Phil? [message #78799 is a reply to message #78730] |
Mon, 30 December 2013 18:17  |
Vaiger
Messages: 102
Registered: December 2012
|
Viscount |
|
|
| LuckyLucy wrote on Fri, 20 December 2013 22:06 |
What Phil said about gays and everything else was perfectly predictable, given that he's a bible-Christian from Louisiana. What's the uproar? Who was expecting him to say anything different?
|
Which is all the more reason why he shouldn't have said anything at all. A straight-lace bible thumper from the south is going to feel that way and we all know it. So no, I wasn't offended.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Get a T-Shirt!
