|
|
Re: flanking subs with small mains [message #75735 is a reply to message #75734] |
Wed, 06 March 2013 17:35 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/forum/theme/AudioRoundTable/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](/forum/theme/AudioRoundTable/images/down.png) |
![](http://audioroundtable.com/forum/images/custom_avatars/5.gif) |
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18754 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
A long time ago, back when I had black light posters all over my walls, I used to run my oscilloscope with its two channels connected to the right and left channels of my stereo. I'd setup to make Lissajous patterns like a little laser light show. One thing I noticed was nearly all music had low frequency content the same in both channels. Of course, there were a few exceptions but they were rare.
So ever since then, I've made a working assumption that the deep LF content of most music material is summed in the mix. That was on my mind when I first recommended the flanking subs approach. While there is the possibility that LF content could be localized in one speaker or the other, in practice it is rare.
That's why I've always suggested that the flanking subs would be part of the multisub approach when distributed subs were run using a summed channel. I am make the assumption that most times, the LF content is summed anyway.
I think it is probably a little more of a concern in movie soundtracks but I'm not entirely sure those would have LF content panned hard to one channel either. It's an unnatural situation, one that doesn't happen in "real life". So I would hope (expect) the sound editors to put deep bass content in all channels in the mix.
Just my 2¢. Well, not quite 2¢ worth there, but maybe a penny.
But hey, while we're on the subject, let's link in Andy's thread here too:
I kinda think you guys are on to something there. Even though I don't expect much material with deep bass panned hard to one channel, your sound mixer / processor idea ensures it is distributed properly. I think that's a great idea.
|
|
|
|
|
Re: flanking subs with small mains [message #75739 is a reply to message #75738] |
Wed, 06 March 2013 22:13 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/forum/theme/AudioRoundTable/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](/forum/theme/AudioRoundTable/images/down.png) |
![](http://audioroundtable.com/forum/images/custom_avatars/5.gif) |
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18754 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
The subwoofer output is merely a summation of all channels low-passed, including the LFE channel, of course. I imagine some Dolby Digital tracks put content in the LFE that isn't anywhere else. But that's not the case in other tracks, like Dolby Surround and Pro Logic. So I know there are modes that can be used that do not present any content to the subwoofer output that isn't present in at least one of the mains, and more likely, in all of them summed together.
But I do think you're probably right when running Dolby Digital and perhaps DTS that the LFE channel sometimes has content that isn't present in any of the mains - whether in large or small mode - and this content is summed in the subwoofer output. So for home theater, when running the Dolby Digital mode, if you want LFE infrasound in the mix, I think what you're saying may be correct.
I can't help but wonder though: If you configure the processor to have no subwoofer, wouldn't it necessitate sending the LFE channel to the mains? Seems like any processor that failed to do that would be defective, an oversight in firmware, at the least. That's the mode I always use, and then run the subs off the preamp outputs for the mains, through an external low-pass filter, of course. I don't believe I am missing any LFE content that way, although to be candid, I haven't checked. I assumed LFE content was sent to the mains when "no subwoofer" was selected.
In any case, modes where the LFE signal is unique is where I think the blending approach you guys are talking about makes a lot of sense. It's not needed for stereo, and it's not needed for the formats that don't rely on an LFE channel. But for the formats that do, this subwoofer/mains mixer sounds like a great idea. It's the way the "full" or "large" mode should mix the signal going to the mains, low-passed for flanking subs. And certainly in cases like what Darrell is talking about - where he selects "small" mode to provide high-pass for his mains, but then high-passes low enough (60-80Hz) to get blending for flanking subs - this subwoofer/mains mixer approach seems very attractive to me.
|
|
|
|
|