ART Arrays for Home Theater [message #32183] |
Tue, 28 August 2007 14:09 ![Go to next message Go to next message](/forum/theme/AudioRoundTable/images/down.png) |
dbishopbliss
Messages: 10 Registered: May 2009
|
Chancellor |
|
|
How do you think the ART arrays would work for a home theater setup? I have a front projection setup so I don't have to worry about shielding. I was thinking I could make a center-channel speaker using two (or maybe four) of the woofers and the same tweeter? Would I need a subwoofer?
|
|
|
|
|
Re: ART Arrays for Home Theater [message #65017 is a reply to message #65008] |
Tue, 30 November 2010 13:36 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/forum/theme/AudioRoundTable/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](/forum/theme/AudioRoundTable/images/down.png) |
![](http://audioroundtable.com/forum/images/custom_avatars/5.gif) |
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18758 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
I'm going to defer to some of the other guys here that are using ART Array loudspeakers, and have lived with them for a while.
A bit of history: Fred Thompson designed the ART Arrays and built the prototypes. He gave them to me, along with two crossovers, and my participation was really limited to just measuring them. I found that one of the two crossovers measured better, so that's the one I recommended. The other crossover was pretty good too, had sort of a "BBC dip" in the response curve. There was some discussion about whether or not a more sophisticated crossover with higher parts count might work better, adding baffle step compensation, for example. I personally think the design with its simple first-order crossover works very well, and while I would have initially thought maybe a higher slope might be better, after measuring the system, I concluded that it was probably my favorite solution. It was simple and cost-effective, which was sort of the spirit of the design. It also measured and sounded very good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|