AudioRoundTable.com: Pi Speakers » Cabbing some Eminence Beta 15s

Home » Sponsored » Pi Speakers » Cabbing some Eminence Beta 15s

Show: Today's Messages :: Navigator :: Polls
E-mail to friend

Cabbing some Eminence Beta 15s [message #63923]

Fri, 27 August 2010 20:34

JCDC
Messages: 43
Registered: August 2010

Baron

Hey All,

I was using B15s for open baffle but now I want to throw them in cabs.
PiAlign comes with many files for the B15: B15, B15 in a pi system and B15 in Boxplot.

The up-to-date specs are:

Vad=11.8
Qd=1.72
Frd=35

Very close to the original:

Vad=11.3
Qd=1.8
Frd=36

PiAlign suggests:
Vol 6.9 cuft, Fr 22.5 and Q .97 (new specs)
Vol 6.3 cuft, Fr 24.3 and Q 1 (old specs)

Going with the new specs yields an aesthetically pleasing 2 x 3 x 1 1/3 ft, 7 cuft cab.
Boxplot shows a 2dB hump centered at 78Hz and an F3 of 44, an F10 of 28 and an F20 of 15. Not bad!

But that is a pretty big cab! Could I get away with a 5 cuft or even the 2.5 of a 4 pi?

In a 5 cuft cab with the same tuning, Boxplot shows a 2.5dB hump centered at 82Hz and an F3 of 48, an F10 of 33 and an F20 of 17.

The 2.5 cuft doesn't look good, with a 4dB hump centered at 97Hz and an F3 of 60, an F10 of 43 and an F20 of 25.

What I don't know about is how this affects impulse response?

What do you think? The 2.5 looks right out ... but how about the 5?

Thanks,
Jeff

PS PiAlign doesn't update the Encl Fr when I change port dimensions?

Report message to a moderator

Re: Cabbing some Eminence Beta 15s [message #63924 is a reply to message #63923]

Fri, 27 August 2010 21:33

Wayne Parham
Messages: 18790
Registered: January 2001

Illuminati (33rd Degree)

PiAlign choses a cabinet and tuning, and doesn't allow you to change that recommendation. There is a little Helmholtz calculator (below) I always used way back when if I wanted to find the box frequency of a given cabinet volume and port. Now days you can do that with any T/S simulator.

I personally didn't work much with the Beta series parts. Not that I thought good or bad of them, it's just that Eminence had so much overlap between series. I've pretty much settled on Alphas for the lower cost drivers, Deltas for the mids and Omegas for the larger prosound stuff. The Betas and Kappas were always good canidates too, but like I said, they are practically overlapping specs with drivers I already use in my standard lines.

For a while, I had even more cabinet/driver combinations but I've narrowed the line to just a few drivers. Those are what I felt gave me the best price/size/performance ratio. But there are a lot of other combinations that will work very well. Sounds like you're on a good track for finding one of them. Keep us posted with your progress.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Helmholtz Calculator

Here's a little BASIC program that will calculate the formulas for you, if you can still find an old BASIC interpreter around somewhere.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Cabbing some Eminence Beta 15s [message #63925 is a reply to message #63924]

Sat, 28 August 2010 09:31

JCDC
Messages: 43
Registered: August 2010

Baron

Thanks Wayne!

Um, errr, how do I interpret Boxplot? Embarassed

The 7 cuft has a 2dB hump centered at 78Hz and an F3 of 44, an F10 of 28 and an F20 of 15.

What will that hump sound like? Does it have consequences for impulse/phase/group delay?

What is an F3 of 44 going to sound like compared to other 15s like an Omega 4Pi or a Delta in a 5 cuft (I had the old theater4)?

Same for the 5 cuft:
5 cuft cab with the same tuning, Boxplot shows a 2.5dB hump centered at 82Hz and an F3 of 48, an F10 of 33 and an F20 of 17.

Also, Boxplot's port calc seems to differ. With V11.8 Q1.72(.58) F35, PiAlign's port is
len 2.5 area 7.3 dia 3.06 Boxplot's port is
len 3.3 area 7.35 dia 3.06
??? Confused

Thanks for the help,
Jeff

Report message to a moderator

Re: Cabbing some Eminence Beta 15s [message #63927 is a reply to message #63925]

Sat, 28 August 2010 17:47

Wayne Parham
Messages: 18790
Registered: January 2001

Illuminati (33rd Degree)

Well, indoors, a 2dB hump in a cabinet is probabably not going to matter much, especially if there is plenty of output below it and with a slow rolloff slope. The larger low-end Eminence woofers all tend to do that in boxes smaller than a house. Rolling Eyes

I'd prefer the Omega 15 because it's a better woofer and can be used in a much smaller box. Of course, it's more expensive but the cost of wood for the larger box kind of makes up for that.

No matter how you slice it, the best thing to do is to add subs. That will smooth everything out. So in a sense, the thing you're looking for is really midbass and midrange quality.

But if you're looking for a budget build, the multisubs and more expensive midwoofers might be too much. In that case, the big box build will give you some deep bass, and if you're not using subs, that can be important.

Report message to a moderator

Baffle spacing for 4Pi? [message #63935 is a reply to message #63927]

Sun, 29 August 2010 13:13

JCDC
Messages: 43
Registered: August 2010

Baron

I decided to go with a larger cab. I decreased the size a bit to make it fit better on a 4 x 8. 33 x 22 x 16.

I did a quick search to find the baffle spacing between the tweet and the woof for the 4Pi. I found a reference to 13.25" but I think that was the old Theater 4 Pi.

Judging from the picture of the 4Pi it looks closer to 12".

What is the exact baffle spacing for the 4Pi?

Thanks,
Jeff

Report message to a moderator

Re: Baffle spacing for 4Pi? [message #63936 is a reply to message #63935]

Sun, 29 August 2010 14:38

Wayne Parham
Messages: 18790
Registered: January 2001

Illuminati (33rd Degree)

I'll send plans, but where wooger/tweeter spacing is concerned, it's almost always safe to assume closer is better. The thing you'll need to worry about is those internal standing waves. They can really mess up the midrange. This has to do more with the positions of the midwoofer and port in relation to the cabinet walls. You can't rely on an existing plan to help, unless cabinet dimensions are the same, because distances to the inside walls will be different. Sometimes there are pipe modes within the port itself too, but only if the port is long.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Baffle spacing for 4Pi? [message #63940 is a reply to message #63936]

Sun, 29 August 2010 17:50

JCDC
Messages: 43
Registered: August 2010

Baron

Thanks Wayne,

I was going to center the B15 top-to-bottom and left-to-right and then put the tweet 12" above that.

At 33 x 22 x 16 it's close to a 3 Pi. So I was imagining a 3 Pi with a 15. I was going to use the same port placement (or the port the same height but centered.)

Using an online standing wave calculator I get:

multiples of 213 Hz for H=31.75"
multiples of 327 Hz for W=20.75"
multiples of 452 Hz for D=15"

Will I run into any problems?

Thanks,
Jeff

Report message to a moderator

Re: Baffle spacing for 4Pi? [message #63943 is a reply to message #63940]

Sun, 29 August 2010 21:24

Wayne Parham
Messages: 18790
Registered: January 2001

Illuminati (33rd Degree)

If you were to run the exact same cabinet as the three π loudspeaker, with the midwoofer and port in the same positions, I would not expect you to have any problems with standing wave harmonics mucking up the midrange. That's a design that has been tested extensively.

Putting a 15" woofer in there makes it a little different though, in that the midwoofer is larger. But I think the standing waves would line up pretty much the same, and the pressure and zero nodes would be in the same places. So that's a pretty good way to go.

The thing is, I think that cabinet may be a little small for your woofer in terms of damping. You won't have standing wave problems, but you may have more traditional T/S alignment problems. That part is easy enough to check with garden variety T/S simulators though.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Baffle spacing for 4Pi? [message #63952 is a reply to message #63943]

Mon, 30 August 2010 18:57

JCDC
Messages: 43
Registered: August 2010

Baron

My cabs are 33 x 22 x 16.25 (5/8 MDF) which is 5.7 cuft (or 5.5 cuft with 300 cubic inches subtracted for offset a la PiAlign)

I tried to stick close to the proportions from PiAlign.

I don't know the dimensions of the 3 Pi. Are they close enough to not worry?

Thanks,
Jeff

Report message to a moderator

Re: Baffle spacing for 4Pi? [message #63953 is a reply to message #63952]

Mon, 30 August 2010 22:14

Wayne Parham
Messages: 18790
Registered: January 2001

Illuminati (33rd Degree)

Sorry, Jeff, those dimensions aren't close enough to the three π cabinet that I'd feel comfortable making an assumption that the standing waves will line up the same. Down low, certainly they will, but up higher they'll be much different. And it's the midrange we're concerned about. I'd definitely model and/or measure the speaker, watching what it does above 150Hz or so.

The three π loudspeaker has outside dimensions of 30" x 20" x 13-1/2". That may seem pretty close to what you propose - and it is - but the difference is significant both in terms of overall volume and in the distances to interior cabinet walls. This will make enough difference you can't really compare one with the other in terms of where standing waves line up inside, particularly at the higher multiples, above the fundamental standing wave nodes. That's usually what you have to watch out for. It is important that the woofer and port not be near standing wave nodes ideally at all harmonic multiples from the fundamental up through the woofer's passband, or at least up high enough that the insulation can effectively damp the sound.

Report message to a moderator

Pages (2): [1 2 › »]

Previous Topic:	Plan request and THANKS
Next Topic:	2 Pi Tower Speakers - How far from back wall?

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Nov 29 11:59:17 CST 2024