|
WTF are you talking about? [message #57157 is a reply to message #57156] |
Wed, 05 October 2005 21:54 |
colinhester
Messages: 1349 Registered: May 2009 Location: NE Arkansas
|
Illuminati (3rd Degree) |
|
|
"Sneaking a supposedly serious point into a post to draw someones honest response for the express purpose of ridiculing or belittling that individual and then disappearing is cowardly and weak." What the fuck are you talking about?
|
|
|
Re: WTF are you talking about? [message #57158 is a reply to message #57157] |
Thu, 06 October 2005 01:37 |
Manualblock
Messages: 4973 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (13th Degree) |
|
|
I notice you use that phrase a lot. It seems simple enough to me whats the problem? Seems to be a mis-communication on a regular basis here. This is what I want to avoid; They ask what seems to be a rational question; wait until you respond in a rational way then instead of responding; post some irresponsible drivel and sign off wasting your time and the bandwidth. I don't know maybe you haven't noticed. It happens a lot and I prefer not to be a part of it. I reply to you here only because you seem somehow unawares that this occurs. Why does this fascinate you anyway; it would seem you would not like this type of snipe posting eithor; so what gives? Read the exchange with Bobby; it is clear as a bell. That is why I do not wish to waste my time. Thats why I asked are you serious; so whats hard here? Had you replied yes; I am serious; then we would have continued; somehow you were sidetracked and this off the wall exchange occured instead of a discussion about legal issues. The concept of legislating from the bench is a difficult topic; why start it if we will not finish it. I don't have a bone to pick or any ego issues. I like when people disagree with me; it's a good thing as long as they are reasonable and can lighten up the tone when required. So rather than think and write a long post that will not recieve a response I ask...are you serious before I committ to the discussion. No one else here would have recieved this much accomodation so what is the issue; or is it some hidden agenda here? Like the Bobby snipe and run scenario. I can't do any more explaining of my posts; it's getting tiresome now. This could have been a productive exchange instead of this whatever it is.
|
|
|