AudioRoundTable.com: Dungeon » Peerless transformers, trademarks and intellectual property rights

Home » xyzzy » Dungeon » Peerless transformers, trademarks and intellectual property rights

Show: Today's Messages :: Navigator :: Polls
E-mail to friend

Peerless transformers, trademarks and intellectual property rights [message #56916]

Wed, 14 September 2005 06:18

Wayne Parham
Messages: 18784
Registered: January 2001

Illuminati (33rd Degree)

Manualblock started a thread on the Group Build forum about an amplifier design. But it used a Peerless transformer or a clone, I'm not exactly sure which yet. What I do know is that it prompted a discussion about intellectual property rights and what not.

Peerless transformers

I could see pretty early on that it was a sensitive issue, and probably might be better discussed here. It certainly didn't have anything to do with an amplifier build or circuit design. So I thought about responding here to start off with, and probably should have right from the start.

I am sympathetic to Mike or anyone else that works hard to build a company, product or trade name. So I'm definitely interested in what he has to say, and I'm concerned about the IP issues we've been talking about. But I also know that Douglas has been pretty supportive of everyone on this website, and has offered some very valuable assistance and good designs. I think he probably has the right to call his transformers Peerless or Peerless clones, unless some legal arangement has been made that I'm not aware of. I guess I'm of two minds on this deal and hope everyone comes to good terms.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Peerless transformers, trademarks and intellectual property rights By: Wayne Parham on Wed, 14 September 2005 06:18
		Re: Peerless transformers, trademarks and intellectual property rights By: Wayne Parham on Wed, 14 September 2005 07:28
		Re: Peerless transformers, trademarks and intellectual property rights By: MQracing on Wed, 14 September 2005 08:09
		Re: Peerless transformers, trademarks and intellectual property rights By: Wayne Parham on Wed, 14 September 2005 08:30
		I don't think that's it.... By: PakProtector on Wed, 14 September 2005 20:05
		Re: I don't think that's it.... By: Wayne Parham on Wed, 14 September 2005 20:36
		root cause By: Thrint on Thu, 15 September 2005 04:22
		Re: root cause By: Wayne Parham on Thu, 15 September 2005 06:19
		Re: root cause By: MQracing on Thu, 15 September 2005 12:32
		Re: root cause By: colinhester on Thu, 15 September 2005 14:25
		Re: root cause By: MQracing on Thu, 15 September 2005 14:45
		Re: root cause By: colinhester on Thu, 15 September 2005 15:02
		Re: root cause By: MQracing on Thu, 15 September 2005 15:15
		Re: root cause By: colinhester on Thu, 15 September 2005 15:48
		Re: root cause By: MQracing on Thu, 15 September 2005 15:58
		Design ownership, public domain and who owns what By: Wayne Parham on Fri, 16 September 2005 01:39
		Re: Design ownership, public domain and who owns what By: Manualblock on Fri, 16 September 2005 10:38
		Re: Design ownership, public domain and who owns what By: PakProtector on Fri, 16 September 2005 14:50
		Re: Design ownership, public domain and who owns what By: MQracing on Fri, 16 September 2005 15:08
		stick to the subject please... By: PakProtector on Fri, 16 September 2005 16:06
		Re: stick to the subject please... By: MQracing on Fri, 16 September 2005 16:27
		this is the last.... By: PakProtector on Fri, 16 September 2005 18:20
		Re: this is the last.... By: MQracing on Fri, 16 September 2005 19:17
		One more example By: Wayne Parham on Sat, 17 September 2005 07:04
		Re: One more example By: MQracing on Sat, 17 September 2005 08:02
		Re: One more example By: Wayne Parham on Sat, 17 September 2005 08:25
		For Wayne and Mike By: colinhester on Sat, 17 September 2005 09:47
		Re: For Wayne and Mike By: Wayne Parham on Sat, 17 September 2005 09:56
		Re: For Wayne and Mike By: Manualblock on Sat, 17 September 2005 14:08
		Re: For Wayne and Mike By: colinhester on Sat, 17 September 2005 14:31
		Re: For Wayne and Mike By: Wayne Parham on Sat, 17 September 2005 14:42
		Re: For Wayne and Mike By: Manualblock on Sat, 17 September 2005 15:45
		Warning Will Robinson! By: Wayne Parham on Sat, 17 September 2005 16:28
		Re: Warning Will Robinson! By: Manualblock on Sat, 17 September 2005 16:47
		Re: For Wayne and Mike By: Russellc on Thu, 29 September 2005 21:28
		Copyrights, trademarks and patents By: Wayne Parham on Thu, 06 October 2005 17:09
		if it were patented.... By: PakProtector on Sat, 17 September 2005 16:17
		Re: For Wayne and Mike By: MQracing on Sun, 18 September 2005 11:54
		Audio Asylum and you By: Wayne Parham on Fri, 23 September 2005 10:40
		Re: For Wayne and Mike By: Wayne Parham on Sat, 17 September 2005 14:33
		that's it in a nutshell, no? By: PakProtector on Sat, 17 September 2005 16:11
		Re: Design ownership, public domain and who owns what By: MQracing on Fri, 16 September 2005 15:14
		a brief expansion of.... By: MQracing on Fri, 16 September 2005 15:39
		Re: a brief expansion of.... By: Manualblock on Fri, 16 September 2005 16:51
		Re: a brief expansion of.... By: MQracing on Fri, 16 September 2005 17:13
		To Doug and Mike........ By: colinhester on Fri, 16 September 2005 17:37
		Re: To Doug and Mike........ By: Wayne Parham on Sat, 17 September 2005 06:14
		Re: To Doug and Mike........ By: MQracing on Sat, 17 September 2005 07:02
		Re: To Doug and Mike........ By: Wayne Parham on Sat, 17 September 2005 07:15
		Re: a brief expansion of.... By: Manualblock on Fri, 16 September 2005 18:17
		you STILL don't get it... By: PakProtector on Fri, 16 September 2005 15:56
		Re: you STILL don't get it... By: MQracing on Fri, 16 September 2005 16:18
		do you mean Doc hoyer? By: MQracing on Fri, 16 September 2005 16:39
		definiton of piracy fits this case well By: MQracing on Fri, 16 September 2005 16:54
		Re: root cause By: Thermionic on Mon, 19 September 2005 12:59
		Here we go again... By: Damir on Wed, 14 September 2005 07:51
		Re: Here we go again... By: Wayne Parham on Wed, 14 September 2005 08:02
		Re: Here we go again... By: MQracing on Wed, 14 September 2005 08:35
		Re: Here we go again... By: Wayne Parham on Wed, 14 September 2005 08:56
		Re: Here we go again... By: MQracing on Wed, 14 September 2005 11:40
		TM 0622592 By: colinhester on Wed, 14 September 2005 14:18
		good detective work Colin.... By: MQracing on Wed, 14 September 2005 14:30
		Re: good detective work Colin.... By: colinhester on Wed, 14 September 2005 16:30
		Re: good detective work Colin.... By: Wayne Parham on Wed, 14 September 2005 17:18
		Here we go again... By: Thrint on Thu, 15 September 2005 04:54
		Re: Here we go again... By: MQracing on Thu, 15 September 2005 07:53
		yep....here we go again. By: PakProtector on Thu, 15 September 2005 09:47
		since you have no interest in speaking.... By: PakProtector on Thu, 15 September 2005 15:30
		Re: since you have no interest in speaking.... By: MQracing on Thu, 15 September 2005 15:53
		we'll deal with this one-at-a-time By: PakProtector on Thu, 15 September 2005 16:05
		Re: we'll deal with this one-at-a-time By: MQracing on Thu, 15 September 2005 16:20
		let's see...ethics... By: PakProtector on Thu, 15 September 2005 17:47
		Re: let's see...ethics... By: MQracing on Thu, 15 September 2005 19:29
		you just don't get it.... By: PakProtector on Thu, 15 September 2005 20:52
		and as to your other accusations... By: PakProtector on Thu, 15 September 2005 18:00
		Some of the rest... By: PakProtector on Thu, 15 September 2005 16:30
		Here we go again... By: PakProtector on Thu, 22 September 2005 19:14
		Here is the reasoning, and proof of the accusation... By: PakProtector on Mon, 26 September 2005 16:39

Previous Topic:	Have to learn how to post pics I guess.
Next Topic:	So the business lobby has requested that the patriot act be changed

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Nov 18 18:30:57 CST 2024