You say>>>"The site says Iraq holds the second largest reserves of light crude in the world. Oil goes on the world market. Breakdown the percentages for the five yrs since 2000. Then add what is being bought through the world market as a percentage of total oil acquisitions divided by the percentage provided on the world market by Iraqi reserves. There you go."
This is total gobbledygook. You do it. Show me where it says any of this. This is a non answer. You have been caught with your facts down. I made a point. I proved my point with the information on the web site provided. Now you prove your point that the is US importing any more that 2% of it's oil from Iraq. I'm not going to spend all this time to prove you wrong again only so you can come up with the next totally unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. So prove what you are saying.
You Say...
"Now your reply that the insurgency requires little in the way of internal support is not acceptable. It requires tremendous amounts of popular support and that is admitted in the latest military analysis as per our high command. That is their real problem; stopping any influx of aid from Syria and Iran has already been accomplished. That was all those manuevers on the western border for the last year."
Again you argue on a totally ridicules theory. That is that the insurgents need some vast kind of popular support. They don't. Do the terrorists that bombed the WTC in New York enjoy a vast popular internal support in New York. Did the terrorists that flew plans into the WTC have vast popular support here? Your premise is wrong so debating it with you is a waste of time. Again why should I have to prove your points. You prove that the terrorists have vast popular support in Iraq?
Now I'm dropping this subject. Unless of course you actually come up with something of merit. You have shown your true colors.
Posting Rules
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Get a T-Shirt!
