Home » xyzzy » Dungeon » Competitive edge
Re: Competitive edge [message #55951 is a reply to message #55950] Sat, 30 October 2004 17:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
Absolutely; but they still benefit from tax incentives. I drive a Buick Roadmaster 1993 and will do so untill the car rusts into oblivion. 100k miles it's still a baby. Tell me about that new Mustang, did they hit the bullseye with that one or what! Gorgeous.

Re: Competitive edge [message #55952 is a reply to message #55951] Sat, 30 October 2004 17:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18703
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)
Yeah, I just saw one of those Mustangs the other day. It sure brought back memories. One of my best friends used to drive a '68 with a 351 Cleveland that he built right. I was with him once when he got ticketed for pulling wheelies in that thing, no kidding.

Re: Competitive edge [message #55953 is a reply to message #55952] Sat, 30 October 2004 18:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
One of the guys at the bar had a 1971 Shelby GT; did that have the 351 clevelend stock; my memory fails me. He took this girl Mary Esmiel for a ride and ran into a telephone pole. She looked exactly like Marlo Thomas, he must have gotten sidetracked. Nice car; it was godawfull fast; I remmember racing a Kawasaki triple, the first one they made with a claimed 0-60 of 4.2 sec. We stayed with him for quite awhile but he took us before the crossroad. Ramblin' again! What did you mean by "Done Right"; was it common to do them wrong?

Re: Competitive edge [message #55954 is a reply to message #55953] Sat, 30 October 2004 18:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18703
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)
That was one of the larger body Mach I style cars, and I think there were several engine options for them. The 351 Cleveland would definitely be one of the options. It got scaled back a lot in 1972.

What I meant by "done right" is meticulous attention to every detail. The engine was tuned right as a combination. It started with a block that was machined precisely, and rings and bearings fitted to that. Then a cam, intake and headers were chosen to match the heads and application. The same care went into the drivetrain, transmission and differential gears were all gone through and chosen for performance. Same with suspension, tires and even body, paint and interior. The car was definitely done right.

Re: Competitive edge [message #55955 is a reply to message #55954] Sat, 30 October 2004 18:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
Gotcha; we used to call that "Blueprinting".

Re: Competitive edge - too much nostalgia? [message #55956 is a reply to message #55949] Sat, 30 October 2004 23:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bill Martinelli is currently offline  Bill Martinelli
Messages: 677
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (1st Degree)

It's funny every (myself included) thinks the old cars were better built. If you think about it for a minute they are not better built, only made more heavy. In a crash test the old cars survived impact but defered all the impact to the passenger. Now days with 'crumple zones' the car is destroyed but the people live on. Sure for us gear heads the whole car and design was more simple in the 60's. things were thicker and we could do more modifications with less thought.
The 60's had some of the most horse power per cubic inch. The 80's took it all away, but it's coming back today in full force with great fuel economy as well. Todays 350 hp vette gets 25mpg on the highway. a 65 small block vette got 12 mpg on good days.
Quality today is actually better. Engines for example have an increased life expectancy every new model. In the 60's and 70's cars with 100,000 miles on them were very rare and would soon be in need of a resting spot. Today a 100k on an engine is not much at all.
Some companies are shooting for 100k as the first tune up point.
Living in a town where Rochester Products and Delco started and lived, we were all found of carburators, points and plugs to earn livings. I dont miss carbs and points these days. I dont miss having to change plugs 1 or 2 times a year either.

In the north east we get snow and then put crazy things like salt on the roads so we can still drive. Here, in 1970 a car never had a chance to make 100k because it would tottally rust out in 4 years. The cars are now thinner, lighter, and we say cheaper. but they last longer. run better, and handle better. There are only a handfull of post war cars that were good handling cars. Sure the big muscle cars went fast,,, in a line. But cars of the showroom floor of yesteryear did not handle good, were not easy or comfortable to drive and didnt brake well either, compared to the new stuff.

There is a problem growing today with the outsourcing and perceptions of loosings jobs. I sure dont have any answers it is all very concerning if you need to work for a living. The typewriter was a great invention. we dont use them any more and all those people lost jobs making them. The transister took over the vacuum tube (for normal people!) The ice house doesnt get to come by and drop a block of ice in the small door on my back porch anymore, I have a fridge now and dont need them.

The technology changes, and as leaders of the free world, If thats the way we want to look at ourselves. We need to make changes and work on the next level. We need to make our own markets. We cant compete with labor in far away lands. If those products were made in USA, we wouldnt be able to afford to buy them. But, Thats not saying there isnt something else we can make here that we all can afford. That is what has kept us a world appart in past.

Lots of changes and I imagine the econimic profs at the college's have no shortage of things to talk about in class these days.

.

Re: Competitive edge - too much nostalgia? [message #55957 is a reply to message #55956] Sun, 31 October 2004 08:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
You know Bill those are good points, the older cars were more difficult and prone to failure. The improvements are real and good; but that is the nature of progress. The issue of why there is very little R&D done in this country and the false impression that we as a nation are not able to produce economically a cost effective manufacturing base is another story. Here is the truth; give us a level playing field; make other countries follow safe manufacturing practice, disallow the sale of goods produced by slave labor, disallow the importation of goods produced in countries that allow deadly environmental conditions to flourish. The average compensation for CEO's in Europe equals 20 times the average skilled workers salary. Here in the U.S.A. they get 40-80 times the same salary. And that trickles down through upper management. Change the rules so that Wall Street does not call the shots and allow companies time to grow and learn instead of having to fill the bottom line out of the box. Instant return on investment or you are gone does nothing to further R&D efforts. I can go on and on but you get the picture; Give Us A Level Playing Field and we will rise again to pre-eminence in the worlds manufacturing. Thank You.

Re: Competitive edge - too much nostalgia? [message #55958 is a reply to message #55956] Sun, 31 October 2004 10:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18703
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)
I agree with you Bill. I agree 100% I'm usually quick to remark when people talk about the "good old days" and how crime has risen and things are getting worse. It's easy to look at the past through rose colored glasses. But really, what was happening 60 years ago was World War II and the atrocities of that period eclipse those of today. The further back you go, the worse it gets. So I'm not glamorizing the past.

What I'm talking about is companies holding back on a good product so they can continue to sell a lesser one. I compared it to the introduction of the overhead valve engine, which was first built in the 20's but not made widely available until the 50's. Companies can get away with that sort of thing if the competition isn't fierce. But if it is, is it really smart to try to eek out profits from an existing (inferior) design if an improved one can be made and with little extra cost?

American cars today are better than they have ever been. But the 1980's American car market was in a slump. Todays cars are better than 1960's cars. But 1980's cars weren't. The automobile industry now realizes that if they want to sell cars, they have to be competitive. But in the 70's and 80's, American car companies were complacent and thought people would buy their cars over "cheap Japanese imports." That cheap Honda CVCC is what kicked America's butts in the 1990's.

So, yeah, todays car market has rebounded. But that's because it learned not to be complacent, in my opinion. Now what I'm saying is when was the last time you bought an American sound system? There are a couple of American loudspeaker manufacturers, and I hope they're paying attention. I'm not saying I know what's best for them, but my guess is that complacency in the status quo probably isn't.

Re: Competitive edge - too much nostalgia? [message #55959 is a reply to message #55957] Sun, 31 October 2004 18:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bill Martinelli is currently offline  Bill Martinelli
Messages: 677
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (1st Degree)

Oh dont get me wrong. I agree with the whole level playing field idea. I think it is unfair for workers in some parts of the world to have to compete with other parts of the world who are paid slave wages. Mom always said "life isn't fair" and it isnt going to change anytime soon. The corperations set much of the pace and its a tough game. Should CEO's make less? Sure! I'm not one so why not. I think pro athletes who squable about 15 mil vs 16 mil is pretty silly too, considering the people who want to go see them play and support their saleries earn 30k and can hardly afford to take their family to an event.

I was always under the impression we did a lot of r&d in this country. After developement the products would then be made some place else. The bottom line I see, is we can't produce economically in this country compared to a lot of others. So I dont try to. I make a lot of parts and then send them places for assembly. The people in other countries who assemble cant develope the parts or produce them. So I keep lots of people employed doing work the lower laber rate countries can't do.

I'd love to see some of the rules change. I'm not too happy with the last 4 years worth of rules but I do what I can to keep hiring more people. That involves Making product from raw materials in house, making product into finished parts in house, Importing products, exporting products and assembling and finishing both in house and overseas. It's sure an uneasy fealing sending things out but it's all in balance.

What I find is that using more affordable labor rates allow products to made and sold more economically. There is then more sales, more market share and I hire more people to develope and produce things in house.

I do agree with you. those are just a few way I work with what I have right now. It was different 10 years ago. and it will be different 10 years from now too. We all hope for the better



Re: Competitive edge - too much nostalgia? [message #55960 is a reply to message #55959] Sun, 31 October 2004 18:28 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
Thanks Bill for that thoughtfull explanation. I wasn't aware you did business on that level so you are probably more aware of import duties and tax subsidies than I am. I appreciate anyone taking the time to explain these things; every little bit of personal experience helps. I don't deny I hold a take no prisoners attitude with management, many years of union work cured me of any sense of empathy with the powers that be. Thanks J.R.

Previous Topic: Hey this is more enlightening than the Ashlee Simpson Debacle ain't it?
Next Topic: My first Holiday shopping experience of the Season
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Jun 07 13:43:19 CDT 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Smith & Larson Audio
Smith & Larson Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest