Something To Be Proud Of [message #54879] |
Thu, 15 December 2005 09:42 |
Manualblock
Messages: 4973 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (13th Degree) |
|
|
Thank God this holiday season that a few hours ago the House Of Representatives voted to back Murtha's Bill to ban torture. Every military expert and criminal expert in the world condemn's torture as ineffective and unworthy of a civilised nation. Every soldier knows and hates the ramifications of having a government backed policy promoting the torture of human beings. About the only folks in favor; VP Cheney and D. Rumsfeld never fought in any war I know of. I guess the man upstairs was watching.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wrong Again, MB [message #54883 is a reply to message #54879] |
Thu, 15 December 2005 19:44 |
elektratig
Messages: 348 Registered: May 2009
|
Grand Master |
|
|
I'll pass over the effectiveness point -- of course it can be. The media has grossly distorted this issue. It has nothing to do with torture. There is already a federal statute banning torture. The dispute was over McCain's ridiculous definition, which bars "cruel, inhuman, OR DEGRADING treatment or punishment." (emphasis added) What the hell does THAT mean? At least one Gitmo detainee claimed that he was degraded because he was forced to deal with a woman guard. If we have a high-level AQ detainee in custody, I say, degrade the hell out him. May I ask you about the "ticking time bomb" (or more likely "ticking WMD") scenario? Is "torture" still off limits?
|
|
|
|
|
Ticking Time Bomb [message #54887 is a reply to message #54885] |
Fri, 16 December 2005 06:30 |
elektratig
Messages: 348 Registered: May 2009
|
Grand Master |
|
|
What I call the "ticking time bomb" scenario is an updated variant of the "Dirty Harry" plot. A terrorist has planted a bomb -- let's make it a dirty nuclear bomb -- somewhere in, say, NYC. The terrorist has been captured, but he won't reveal where the bomb is planted. What do you do? If you think that's unrealistic, I'll give you a more subtle version. We capture Zarquawi -- someone we know is a high-level terrorist who has tremendous amounts of valuable information -- the identities and locations of high-level associates, the locations of safehouses and caches of IEDs and other weapons, information about planned and ongoing operations, etc. Obtaining this information will save at least hundreds and more likely thousands of innocent lives. He won't tell us anything. What do you do?
|
|
|
|
|