Also I have "NEVER" said he was innocent. Do you read any of my actual posts I make or just have knee jerk reactions without reading? Since neither I nor anyone else has said he was innocent what were you vindicated in?

What do you think this might mean? It's from the same thread that I know you must have read because you wouldn't respond without reading the posts right?:
"This is why I say it sounds like he is innocent. I am not saying he is innocent but that it looks like it. We well see."

**Now read this part carefully. Ready?
Tom DeLay has not been convicted of anything at all yet. So what are you talking about???

2000 dead and countless wounded in horrible ways for nothing
A breeding ground for terrorism in Iraq and Afghanistan
A broken stretch of relationships with what used to be our allies overseas
A terrible deficit weighing the future generations down with fiscal disaster
The symbol of America on the nightly news fumbling and bumbling around in New Orleans like a helpless giant
Religous wacko's running major political campaigns with impunity and dictating to the citizens how they can behave all the while paying no taxes and living off the taxpayers dime.
Countlesss potential terrorists flooding across the southern borders while the feds are busy searching baby carriages and old ladies from Minnesota in airports
The loss of American scientific supremecy to overseas interests due to religously motivated prevention of research
Nice...real nice.

Same thing with our tax discussion I say one thing, you say it's wrong, I prove you wrong, you change the subject.

Basic liberal tactics.

But thanks for your posts. I'm keeping them for my reference as examples of how a liberal squirms when presented with the facts. So it wasn't a complete waste of time.