Miers [message #54742] |
Mon, 17 October 2005 18:55 ![Go to next message Go to next message](/forum/theme/AudioRoundTable/images/down.png) |
Manualblock
Messages: 4973 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (13th Degree) |
|
|
This is great; a Supreme Court Justice with a serious father fixation on a guy who looks and sounds like Alfred E. Newman. A grown woman who speaks like a teenybopper," Gee I hope the twins know their parents are,'cool'." Freud could do a whole thesis on this one.She's against abortion; so, whats abortion? Thats after you have sex. So; whats sex?
|
|
|
Re: Miers [message #54751 is a reply to message #54742] |
Tue, 18 October 2005 08:40 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/forum/theme/AudioRoundTable/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](/forum/theme/AudioRoundTable/images/down.png) |
Bill Martinelli
Messages: 677 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (1st Degree) |
|
|
Since Reagan, the most publicized issue for choosing a new Supreme Court justice has stemmed from the appointees view on the Roe vs. Wade ruling. Surely there must be more issues to choosing a justice for the highest court in the land, no matter which side of the isle you sit on.Maybe one of the most rudimentary requirements should be that you have prior experience as a judge before? What gives here, how does a person even recognize a thought that says hey, let’s nominate this fine lawyer for a justice seat on the supreme court. The JP at the Elvis chapel of love in Vegas could have more judiciary experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|