AudioRoundTable.com: Tower

Home » xyzzy » Tower » Miers

Show: Today's Messages :: Navigator :: Polls
E-mail to friend

Re: Miers [message #54751 is a reply to message #54742]

Tue, 18 October 2005 08:40

Bill Martinelli
Messages: 677
Registered: May 2009

Illuminati (1st Degree)

Since Reagan, the most publicized issue for choosing a new Supreme Court justice has stemmed from the appointees view on the Roe vs. Wade ruling. Surely there must be more issues to choosing a justice for the highest court in the land, no matter which side of the isle you sit on.

Maybe one of the most rudimentary requirements should be that you have prior experience as a judge before? What gives here, how does a person even recognize a thought that says hey, let’s nominate this fine lawyer for a justice seat on the supreme court. The JP at the Elvis chapel of love in Vegas could have more judiciary experience.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Miers By: Manualblock on Mon, 17 October 2005 18:55
		Re: Miers By: Bill Martinelli on Tue, 18 October 2005 08:40
		Re: Miers By: Manualblock on Tue, 18 October 2005 09:42
		And the 41 other appointees that were confirmed without being a judge first.... By: Mr Vinyl on Tue, 18 October 2005 10:13
		Re: And the 41 other appointees that were confirmed without being a judge first.... By: Bill Martinelli on Tue, 18 October 2005 11:45
		Re: And the 41 other appointees that were confirmed without being a judge first.... By: Mr Vinyl on Tue, 18 October 2005 12:35
		Re: And the 41 other appointees that were confirmed without being a judge first.... By: Bill Martinelli on Tue, 18 October 2005 14:07
		Re: And the 41 other appointees that were confirmed without being a judge first.... By: Manualblock on Tue, 18 October 2005 13:43

Previous Topic:	Sure looks like DeLay is innocent....
Next Topic:	Watch the New Tax Law

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Dec 01 18:07:33 CST 2024