Home » Sponsored » Pi Speakers » Theater 3 baffle size and driver arrangement
Theater 3 baffle size and driver arrangement [message #49953] |
Tue, 05 September 2006 09:41 |
Chris Leger
Messages: 6 Registered: May 2009
|
Esquire |
|
|
Hi, I was a lurker here a few years ago... went so far as to buy some 2226s and 2126s only to abort, sell the components, and stick with my old Klipsch stuff. Now I'm in a new house, and space is limited. My living room is 14'x20' with a fireplace in the middle of the wall at the end where the speakers will go. The chimney extends into the room about 2', so the result is I have 2 24"x48" "nooks" at either side of the chimney. I'm installing some custom shelves in these rectangular spaces, and once again my thoughts turn to a pair of horn-loaded cabinets. Space is at an even greater premium than the above might suggest, as there's a 46"x34" TV on one side, and I can only mount it so high, so I'm left with limited vertical space. Further, the shelves will be suspended on threaded rod that will intrude 6" or so into the shelves. Thus, the volume I have to work with is approximately 36" wide, 24" deep, and perhaps 15" or so high. Works out to about 6 cu ft of available volume, I think. Right now, I'm using a pair of JBL L100s, and I like them, but they just don't have the open sound I'm looking for. I mention the L100s because the 12" speakers in the small cabinets give some decent bass, though it doesn't extend as low as I'd like. My thinking is I'd like to stick with 12" woofers because they won't require as tall a baffle in front, and I'd rather not have to raise the TV any higher than it is. But I'm thinking with a larger (WxD) cabinet, I might get some more extension... So, I've been sitting here envisioning a cabinet with perhaps a JBL 2206 with a 2126/2070A mounted alongside. At 36" wide, The horn and woofer could be installed with a few inches of margin around each one... but I really don't understand whether this is practicable or not. I should mention that I'm running Linux, so running the PiAlign and BoxPlot programs is not trivial. I can do it, but I figured I'd jump in here first and see if you folks think what I'm contemplating seems sane so far. So, my question is, can a cabinet (e.g. Theater 3, though I don't know its true dimensions) be oriented so that the baffle is on the side of the cabinet, with the drivers I'm contemplating arranged horizontally? Will this yield decent results? I can go smaller in any dimension (36"W x 24"D x 15"H) for tuning purposes, but bigger is going to be a problem. Thanks in advance! Chris Leger
|
|
|
|
Meant 2426, not 2126. [message #49957 is a reply to message #49953] |
Tue, 05 September 2006 11:12 |
Chris Leger
Messages: 6 Registered: May 2009
|
Esquire |
|
|
Thinking about it some more, given that JBL calls for a 1-to-4 cu ft cabinet for the 2206, this should be doable... I guess my real question is, will having a sort of "pizza box" (wide and flat) cabinet with a short and wide baffle introduce any sonic weirdness? Where should I be headed next? Decompiling PiAlign & BoxPlot? Oh yeah, original post should have refered to 2426 drivers not 2126(?) Thanks again!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Meant 2426, not 2126. [message #49962 is a reply to message #49960] |
Tue, 05 September 2006 11:43 |
Chris Leger
Messages: 6 Registered: May 2009
|
Esquire |
|
|
Thanks Wayne! Hmm... I was also thinking that since these cabs would be installed in these spaces as I've described, (and therefore mostly obscured) I could try designing them so they have no parallel surfaces (why, I wouldn't even need to finish anything other than the baffle!) Am I brushing up against the "standing wave" problem you've mentioned? Obviously, given the space available, there is only so much I can do... Please forgive me for being so clueless. My thinking was that I could construct a box of appropriate dimensions for the drivers chosen, proper length port, etc... but I understand that it's more complex. Best regards, Chris Leger
|
|
|
Re: Theater 3 baffle size and driver arrangement [message #49963 is a reply to message #49961] |
Tue, 05 September 2006 11:51 |
Chris Leger
Messages: 6 Registered: May 2009
|
Esquire |
|
|
Thanks again Wayne. I suspected it had something to do with the 2206 keeping up with the horn. Well, I have monitors now (L100s.) Like I said, I like them, with the exception of the LE25 tweeter. It's just dead and flat sounding to me. My reflex is to think "horns." Maybe I really do need to think about hot-rodding these monitors. I can keep my eyes peeled for some slot tweeters, I guess, and try to educate myself about crossover design. Either that, or give more consideration to a 17"-18" high cabinet with 15" woofers for my available space. 3" might not sound like a lot, but it's going to be critical for my application. Many thanks for your time and consideration. Chris Leger
|
|
|
Standing waves inside cabinets [message #49965 is a reply to message #49962] |
Tue, 05 September 2006 14:40 |
|
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18789 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
Using non-parallel walls is one way of reducing standing waves, but another is to use dimensions that break them up. Damping is yet another way of reducing standing waves.A long, thin cabinet will develop pipe resonance. That's the tuning method used in a transmission line. You don't generally want transmission line behaviour in a bass-reflex box because the tuning mechanism in a bass-reflex box is Helmholtz resonation, not pipe mode resonation. There's nothing really wrong with having both mechanisms in play - Helmholtz resonantion and pipe mode resonation. You could design something that used both, but it is harder to model and usually the designer expects one mode or the other. In his models, he usually doesn't even consider the unwanted mode, and uses damping or position or geometry to get the desired results. In the case of a bass-reflex box, a long thin box may create standing wave modes that aren't expected. If they aren't damped with stuffing, there will be peaks and dips in response that aren't shown in Helmholtz models. That's why, if making the box tall and thin, I suggest analyzing the system from a standing wave point of view in addition to Helmholtz, so you can see what it is doing. If standing waves are present in the bass range, they may work in your favor, or they may hurt you. Either way, if the box is tall and thin, you won't know about them from a bass-reflex modeling program alone.
|
|
|
Re: Standing waves inside cabinets [message #49967 is a reply to message #49965] |
Tue, 05 September 2006 15:16 |
Chris Leger
Messages: 6 Registered: May 2009
|
Esquire |
|
|
Thanks for hanging in there with me on this, Wayne. Spent idle time time today going back-and-forth between tweeter upgrades for the L100s or else replacing with L112s, and figuring I need to build some horn-loaded speakers becasue I'm never going to be happy with these monitors. Stuffing/damping shouldn't pose much of a problem... I am going to take a look at Martin King's spreadsheet as you suggested. Maybe this is a no-no, but what about putting an l-pad on the horn, in concert with the 2206?
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Nov 28 14:00:12 CST 2024
|