Psychoacoustics - I have been following the discussions on this forum about "psychoacoustics" and the (good) effect of wood (and bronze by the way) in electronics and acoustics.
This is another web site that most of us might have found allready;
"Dieter Ennemosers C37 Theorie" ...and the wood-cone speaker design patent(http://www.ennemoser.com/index.html)

• Dieter Ennemosers C37 Theorie

The isobaric arrangement has cones driven so that each moves together, forming an isobaric pressure zone between them. Basically, they cancel in this zone. The other side of the cones is exposed, and that's what generates useful output. The idea is to create a motor with twice the strength and twice the moving mass.

The push-pull configuration has cones driven so each pressurizes the zone between them. One is driven so that it creates positive pressure from the front size of the cone and the other from the back. The idea is to reduce distortion by cancelling harmonics.

The force that moves a loudspeaker cone is not perfectly linear, and its back and forth motion is not perfectly symmetrical. This is because the magnetic field generated by the voice coil deforms the magnetic field of the fixed magnet. This causes eddy currents in the magnetic circuit, literally modulating the flux. Further, the magnetic circuit is made of several parts, the center pole, top plate and back plate, in addition to the magnet itself. These may saturate at different levels, which will also cause force asymmetry. These are the primary causes of distortion in a loudspeaker.

The push-pull configuration cancels any asymmetries by having two identical drive units running in opposite directions. Essentially you have a strong motor and a weak motor on each half cycle. On each contiguous half cycle, the strong one and the weak one flip.

But the freq. resp. band is now reduced to about 500Hz. What happen to the freq between 500Hz and 1K? Is the electrical output being "spread" by the (two) isobarik speakers so it gives a dim output on the midhighs around 1KHz, and the low's working like a piston develop a better response, like a stronger motor "with twice the strength"?

In this case, if I use the isobarik design, I will have to change the xover frequency from 1KHz to about 500Hz for an even output and nice xover to the lowmids and upper bands(?). Am'I correct? Is the loss in power (500Hz-1KHz) virtually measurable and degraded by such a respectable amount or only approximate?
Best Regards.

• Comparison of isobaric and push-pull woofer systems