Suggestions for Active crossover for Theater 4 pi (long) [message #47423] |
Wed, 03 August 2005 06:40 |
Frank Mena
Messages: 26 Registered: May 2009
|
Chancellor |
|
|
Right now I have my Foreplay II & Paramours (with iron upgrade) with Theater 4 pi's and this system really kick's serious butt. Try as I might, my room dimensions/characteristic's won't let me get that bit of extra bass I would like to fill out the bottom end. So I was thinking of looking at a two way tube(Marchand?)active crossover in addition to adding an active sub to the system. It would look like >> CD player then Foreplay then Paramours then active crossover then 4 Pi's with one out of the active X-over going to the active sub. Is this be the correct order? or is it active-x-over then amps then speaker & sub? I would still use the passive theater 4 pi crossover? No? Yes? Any suggestions for an active sub that would blend well with the above system? Parts Express DIY? And FINALLY the last question, does an active crossover increase the depth of image (or 3 D soundscape if you will)? I have to say that I could easily live with the way the system is right now with no changes, but half of the fun for me is seeing what tweaks I can do to change this and that & see what happens as a result. These speakers are truely awesome. Thanks all!!
|
|
|
Re: Suggestions for Active crossover for Theater 4 pi (long) [message #47424 is a reply to message #47423] |
Wed, 03 August 2005 07:40 |
GarMan
Messages: 960 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (2nd Degree) |
|
|
Hey Frank, Good to see you completed the Theatre-4 and you're enjoying it. They don't go all the way down to shake your walls, but low enough for most music. I'm assuming what you want to do is keep the passive crossover in your Theatre-4 and use a 2-way active crossover to integrate a sub. There's a couple of options: 1) Active X0/Biamp. In this option, you'll need a 2-way active crossover with a summing function for the low freq, and a monoblock amp in addition to your Paramours. Sequence will be CDP -> Foreplay -> Active XO. One output from the XO will go to Paramours than Theatre-4. The second output from the XO will go to your new amp than sub. 2) Plate-amp/subwoofer amp. While the first option is technically the "best", it doesn't have to be that complicated nor expensive. A lot of us that received great results from a simple plate amp. All plate amp and subwoofer amps have an active low pass filter built in, so you don't need a separate active crossover. Just build your sub, slap a plate-amp on it and connect it to the output of your Foreplay. You'll have to split the output of your Foreplay so one goes to the plate-amp while the other connects to the Param's. If you're looking for something a little different in a sub, Bill Fitz has a couple of interesting options on his site. Gar.
|
|
|
|
Re: Suggestions for Active crossover for Theater 4 pi (long) [message #47426 is a reply to message #47425] |
Wed, 03 August 2005 11:34 |
GarMan
Messages: 960 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (2nd Degree) |
|
|
Frank, If you're using an active XO to divide the signal between your Theatre-4 and sub, there's no need for a passive XO in your sub. I re-read your original post again and you mentioned "active-sub" a few times. An "active-sub" usually has a plate amp (active low-pass and amp) built in, so you don't want to use one if you're using an external active XO and amp for the sub. Again, the second option of just using a plate-amp is very respectable and economical. Perhaps Bill Epstein can say a few words about his Titanic and Theatre-4 combo. Gar.
|
|
|
Re: Suggestions for Active crossover for Theater 4 pi (long) [message #47427 is a reply to message #47426] |
Wed, 03 August 2005 14:13 |
Chris R
Messages: 133 Registered: May 2009
|
Master |
|
|
I don't have the particular setup you have, but I built a sub with one of the plate amps from Parts Express. Its the 250W, no remote one. Its driven from the HT receiver sub out, so no external XO. The plate amp does have line level stereo in/out, so you can put it in the signal path. I don't use it that way so I don't know if that's better or worse than using a Y connector on your preamp outputs. The other thing to think about is that if you put the plate amp in the middle, I have no idea how good (slope, etc.) the return feed is or if the XO freq tracks the knob or not. I'd go for an external XO and the plate amp. I like to brag: http://cerchaos.homeip.net:1280/woodworking5.htmlChris
|
|
|
Re: Suggestions for Active crossover for Theater 4 pi (long) [message #47428 is a reply to message #47427] |
Wed, 03 August 2005 14:58 |
GarMan
Messages: 960 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (2nd Degree) |
|
|
Chris, if I had a sub as nice as yours, I'd brag too. I'd only use the high-pass filter in a plate amp as a last resort. I think it's much better to use the natural rolloff of the main speakers and adjust the low-pass freq on the plate amp accordingly to integrate. My Theatre-3's go pretty low by themselves and I'd assume the 4's go even lower. You'd have to bring the low-pass freq on the plate amp down to the 40Hz range for good integration. Gar.
|
|
|
|
|
Re: stupid sub [message #47434 is a reply to message #47432] |
Fri, 05 August 2005 09:24 |
Chris R
Messages: 133 Registered: May 2009
|
Master |
|
|
Yeah, the bedroom system hardly gets used for music. Its really only for watching movies, and for that, its pretty nice. It was one of those "I have to have a setup like that, but I want to make my own" kind of things. You can't believe the money I "saved" doing it this way! NOT! Esp. when you include the cost of the tools.Chris
|
|
|
|