Transmission lines are 1/4 or 1/2 based enclosures (like horns) and use polyfill to slow the speed of sound, and thus shorten the transmission length. A 30 Hz, 1/4 wave transmission line has a length of about 9.4 feet. If stuffing is used in the line, it reduces the length required to around 3-4 feet. This his a huge advantage.

What I'm wondering is, could this principle be applied to horns as well? Obviously not possible on mid or high horns, but on bass horns, could you extensively stuff the horn itself with polyfill, reducing the necessary length of the horn? My theory is similar advantages could be realized, with the necessary horn length being cut in half or even more. However, I'm not sure if this would affect the mouth size, and if the resulting change in expansion rate would mess up response.

Even if this didn't work, could stuffing a 1/4 wavelength horn with polyfill help increase the perceived length closer to 1/2, and thus smooth out frequency response and improve sound quality?

Adam

Another experimental thing that Charlie Deluca and I have been kicking around is using amorphous metals for diaphragms. I'd sure like to have access to a shop that had the ability to try it out.

You wrote :

"Transmission lines are 1/4 or 1/2 based enclosures (like horns) and use polyfill to slow the speed of sound, and thus shorten the transmission length. A 30 Hz, 1/4 wave transmission line has a length of about 9.4 feet. If stuffing is used in the line, it reduces the length required to around 3-4 feet. This his a huge advantage."

First, a transmission line is a 1/4 wave device just like a horn. There are no 1/2 wave action in either, that would violate the laws of physics for an open ended geometry.

Second, the fiber does not slow the speed of sound very much. Fiber only attenuates the higher frequencies and will not result in a drmatically shorter line length. The speed of sound is slowed less than 10% with very heavy stuffing.

Hope that helps,

Martin

Yes I have seem that article before and you are right it is a very good introduction. I use essnetially the same formulas and predict similar results. Physics is physics.

Martin