AudioRoundTable.com: Pi Speakers » Here we go again. Merits of 2" compression vs cone midrange

Home » Sponsored » Pi Speakers » Here we go again. Merits of 2" compression vs cone midrange

Show: Today's Messages :: Navigator :: Polls
E-mail to friend

Sketchy about crossover points [message #44691 is a reply to message #44687]

Mon, 31 May 2004 20:38

GarMan
Messages: 960
Registered: May 2009

Illuminati (2nd Degree)

I thought about the crossover points too, between the cone and compression. But I'm still a little sketchy on what is considered the forbidden area.

Some say stay away from 315 to 2500, so the cone makes more sense than the compression.

But other readings say vocal fundalmentals starts at 80 and is pretty much finished by 1200. If that's the case, wouldn't the crossover point of a cone midrange be smack-dap in the middle of the vocal funalmentals and the higher crossover point of a compression make more sense?

Gar.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Here we go again. Merits of 2" compression vs cone midrange By: GarMan on Mon, 31 May 2004 15:09
		Re: Here we go again. Merits of 2" compression vs cone midrange By: Adam on Mon, 31 May 2004 16:30
		Sketchy about crossover points By: GarMan on Mon, 31 May 2004 20:38
		Re: Sketchy about crossover points By: Wayne Parham on Mon, 31 May 2004 23:29
		Re: Here we go again. Merits of 2" compression vs cone midrange By: HenryW on Mon, 31 May 2004 19:45
		Re: Here we go again. Merits of 2" compression vs cone midrange By: GrantMarshall on Tue, 01 June 2004 05:35

Previous Topic:	studio 2 pi
Next Topic:	Two Pi Plans

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Nov 30 03:51:34 CST 2024