Home » Sponsored » Pi Speakers » New stuff
Re: Flux symmetry confirmation [message #44118 is a reply to message #44116] Thu, 04 March 2004 02:42 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Adrian Mack is currently offline  Adrian Mack
Messages: 568
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (1st Degree)

Hey Wayne

Ah, thats good to know. Thanks for asking them for me. Only the Magnum's have the faraday rings I'm sure?

How is static physical symmetry achieved? I would think that the flux field has to be symmetrical if the voice coil is not present or not considered, because it's the back EMF along with the AC field generated by the drive current in the voice coil that causes modulation of the flux. So if theres no voice coil, then none of these factors exist and the gap field would have to be symmetrical (just like if the driver was not connected to anything, nothing can cause modulation).

It's this sentence that's just confusing me a bit: "This design feature is important to quality, and should be considered an improvement over designs that fail to provide static physical symmetry". What is the design feature considering that neglecting the voice coil must mean the field is symmetrical? Or I might have gone wrong somewhere......

Adrian

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: jbl 2242 vs 2245
Next Topic: cap voltages
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Dec 01 04:43:25 CST 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest