JBL 2205 vs. 2225 [message #43989] |
Wed, 18 February 2004 08:45 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd0ac/bd0ac06bc0716245c70e1d7ca4a193e4fbe25374" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
HenryW
Messages: 44 Registered: May 2009
|
Baron |
|
|
I am looking at a 2205h reconed to 2225h specs. What should I expect from this speaker - I can't tell if I am looking at a 2205 or 2225. Anyone have thoughts on how this would work for my LF? Sorry about the simplistic nature of this question, but I am a bit confused about what effect this reconing would have on performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Yep - looks like... [message #43999 is a reply to message #43998] |
Wed, 18 February 2004 18:01 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/413e0/413e00f5cba1f3b2b5107f9dcfe0ee2b05c7be55" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b0b8/6b0b8078a953053baa04facec1beff407ed1de69" alt="" |
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18837 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
The 2205A had an alnico magnet. The 2205H had a ferrite magnet with a flux stabilization ring. So yours is a 2205A with a C8R2225 cone assembly? That's an interesting breed. I'll bet it's smoooooth.
|
|
|