CD vs expo horns [message #36399] |
Sun, 12 May 2002 17:34 |
Paul C.
Messages: 218 Registered: May 2009
|
Master |
|
|
Wayne, can you explain the differnce between CD horns and other types? Also, I read the Crossover paper you have on your site, and it covers many of the things you and I had discussed in the past, but in great depth and detail. Very good paper!!! Thanks from all of us! Paul
|
|
|
|
Re: CD vs expo horns [message #36403 is a reply to message #36402] |
Sun, 12 May 2002 19:02 |
Paul C.
Messages: 218 Registered: May 2009
|
Master |
|
|
Thanks for the links, Wayne, good reading! A followup question... After running the numbers with various horns, and looking at sometimes published cut-off frequencies, I am surprised at how low some small horns supposedly go. But in actual application, I see that HF horns are seldom used near their low end cutoff. One horn tweeter I have in my commercially mfg'd PA spkrs, the flare has a published cutoff of 780 hz, and programs I have run the numbers come in close to that. This horn is used with a 12 db crossover at 2500 hz. Is there a "rule of thumb" in this? For example, if a horn has a 500 hz cutoff, how much higher would be an appropriate crossover frequency? Or, conversely, if I had a driver which I wanted to crossover at 1000 hz (to pick a nice round number out of thin air), what cutoff would I look for in a flare?
|
|
|
Re: CD vs expo horns [message #36404 is a reply to message #36403] |
Sun, 12 May 2002 19:33 |
SirAdam
Messages: 4 Registered: May 2009
|
Esquire |
|
|
I believe you get higher distortion levels the closer you get to the flare frequency, so it tends to be better to keep crossover frequency an octave or more away from the flare frequency... Although I don't think you'd have serious problems? A lot of the times this is simply a cosmetic thing, I believe Wayne has mentioned this as a reason for suggesting a lense like the CH-3. An actual 1600 Hz lense would look kinda goofy on such big speakers. Adam
|
|
|
|
Hey Wayne What are the Baby Butts??? [message #36410 is a reply to message #36405] |
Mon, 13 May 2002 08:57 |
Robert Hamel
Messages: 93 Registered: May 2009
|
Viscount |
|
|
A few months ago I asked if your compensation would work on the 2344A and you pointed me in the right direction to get the job done, Thanks. I am curious how these would be characterized. It appears they are not CD and definitely not expotential or Tractrix. Just curious cause they sure do sound good!
|
|
|
|
|