Re: Can someone help me critique this theory I have been formulating? [message #3613 is a reply to message #3610] |
Wed, 30 August 2006 13:50 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/forum/theme/AudioRoundTable/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](/forum/theme/AudioRoundTable/images/down.png) |
Mr Vinyl
Messages: 407 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (1st Degree) |
|
|
Hi Akhilesh, I understand what your saying now. But let me ask one more question. I don't know if you have ever done this. But if you matched the sound of two preamps using your predetermined sine frequency of 1khz. Does that mean that any other frequency you play through the preamps in question would also be matched in volume? Or would the preamps only be matched at that single frequency? Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
Re: Can someone help me critique this theory I have been formulating? [message #3615 is a reply to message #3613] |
Wed, 30 August 2006 14:07 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/forum/theme/AudioRoundTable/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](/forum/theme/AudioRoundTable/images/down.png) |
colinhester
Messages: 1349 Registered: May 2009 Location: NE Arkansas
|
Illuminati (3rd Degree) |
|
|
That's why one is concerned about flatness of frequency responce. Did you read the review on the Boulder amp Azcel uses as a reference? This is dead-nuts flat. I'm still going through "The Audio Critic." What a great magazine!! I don't agree with him on several issues (eg., tube amps being expensive tone controls.) More later......Colin
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Can someone help me critique this theory I have been formulating? [message #3619 is a reply to message #3614] |
Wed, 30 August 2006 14:26 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/forum/theme/AudioRoundTable/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](/forum/theme/AudioRoundTable/images/down.png) |
Mr Vinyl
Messages: 407 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (1st Degree) |
|
|
Ok, for your benefit only. I don't want to debate these things but I think these statements you made are half truths. "I know Aczel believes it is; yet don't you find it a little puzzling that these DBT results almost never coincide with results that would provide a usefull set of data?" "Not to mention that the samples are always way too small for a true DBT study to have any validity. In other words it is almost always a wash regarding information that would prove anything one way or the other." "Which brings us back to the guitar question. How do they all come to agree?" Hope that helps.
|
|
|
|
|
|