Home » Sponsored » Pi Speakers » "Pi Pad" implemented with series xover
"Pi Pad" implemented with series xover [message #35103] Tue, 12 February 2002 14:02 Go to next message
Sam P. is currently offline  Sam P.
Messages: 307
Registered: May 2009
Grand Master
I decided to try using Wayne's 12 dB "Pi Pad" instead of my adjustable lpads in a system using a series xover at 1200 Hz. Since the knobs were set to -12 dB w/ the spl, I figured installing the fixed 12 dB would work too. Sound from left to right stayed balanced (only did left side), so that part was cool. I'll play w/ comp caps once I get the other side done.

Since I just can't leave well enough alone...EUREKA...I had built the network using all 8 ohm resistors...three in series for R1=24 (ok, 25 would have been nice), and two in series for R2=16 ohms. All parts were rat shack 20W 8 ohm non-inductive (PE p/n 271-120).

NORMAL/BRIGHT switch COULD be used to short out one of the three that make up R1, giving 16 ohms, I.E. we now have a -10 dB "Pi pad" profile instead of -12 dB...HF output goes up +2 dB in the bright position.

Alternatively, users with 10 dB pads who feel their setup is a bit bright might want the option of a NORMAL/SOFT switch, good for late night listening, better tonal balance? Toning down that occasional shrill CD?

Wayne, now tell me the down side...or is this what Replay, Till, or somebody was asking about a few weeks ago? Sam



Re: "Pi Pad" implemented with series xover [message #35108 is a reply to message #35103] Tue, 12 February 2002 16:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18748
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)
Some people like having an L-Pad or other adjustable control on their loudspeakers. Personally, I don't like them, because they change the crossover and compensation network's electrical filter characteristics. I prefer the user who wishes tone control to use the tone control on their preamps instead.

If you look at the R1/R2 ratio, it controls the amount of peaking of the filter formed by the tweeter, its compensation circuit and the crossover. Play with these values using Spice and you'll see what I mean about affecting filter Q by changing these values.

I'm just suggesting utilizing the [message #35111 is a reply to message #35108] Tue, 12 February 2002 16:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Sam P. is currently offline  Sam P.
Messages: 307
Registered: May 2009
Grand Master
the values shown in the xover doc, using the R1/R2 network to split the power. The only difference is R1 was shown in one to be 16 ohm (10 dB) in series with the driver, the other has 25 ohms (12 dB). Both used the same 16 ohm R2 and 0.47 uF cap. Then I used the network for the HF portion/load in a series xover I use, in place of the adjustable lpad.
I want to play some more, with extended listening, to determine if 10, 11, or 12 dB will work out with the widest range of material in regard to overall tonal balance between the bass and HF in my listening environment. Discrete steps will be easier to get more consistent results with than the wide range, from bad to OK to bad, of adjustable ones. I agree with Wayne, adjustable lpads have no place on a speaker where curious fingers may stray...Sam
Re: I'm just suggesting utilizing the [message #35114 is a reply to message #35111] Tue, 12 February 2002 18:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam is currently offline  Adam
Messages: 419
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (1st Degree)
Well, Part of the point really is to match up the sensitivities with the amp gains.

You could do what you propose... But an active circuit would still be better.

You're really killing half (at least) of the point of going active by throwing in an lpad post-amplifier.

Adam

these are my HT left/right speakers [message #35117 is a reply to message #35114] Wed, 13 February 2002 05:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Sam P. is currently offline  Sam P.
Messages: 307
Registered: May 2009
Grand Master
that use passive xovers. I am working on triamping my main music system, but the HT, with five speakers, too much "gear" would be involved to go active. But I am "upgrading" the HT from 5 inch tall speakers w/ 3 in. woofers (all 5 of them!) driven by my dolby prologic 6 channel amp; to dual 15's for left/right, quasi 4 Pi pro's (single 15's) for the rear surrounds, and maybe will go EV 15W woofer, 8hd/T-25a mid, and t-35 tweet for center channel (basically a Khorn without the horn loading). Total of SEVEN 15's, and we haven't even gotten to the subwoofer yet. All around 100 dB sensitivity. And it was loud enough before, with the tiny speakers that were under 90 dB sense probably. One of those rare instances that "a fantastic difference" from the upgrade was audible...even in my neighbors living room...across the street...with their windows closed...just kidding. But with just the left/rights working (jbl 4648A-8's w/ 511 altec horns), on sat tv concerts, sound is so OVERWHELMING/NICE I want to buy albums from people I've never heard before, like jewel, bb and the fleck tones (INFUKINGCREDIBAL DRUM GUITAR), wife even sat thru Willie Nelson live from amsterdam (poor people there in the audience were so broke, some of them had to share a single, hand rolled cigarette!). Yep, I'm almost as enthusiastic as a new SET convert, and that says a lot. Sam
Re: these are my HT left/right speakers [message #35123 is a reply to message #35117] Wed, 13 February 2002 09:16 Go to previous message
Adam is currently offline  Adam
Messages: 419
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (1st Degree)
I understand now. Don't know how I got it in my head you were running active xovers.

Adam

Previous Topic: Day Two in the Life of a 4 Pi
Next Topic: building 3 way system with jbl 4655
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Aug 16 02:19:26 CDT 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest