Home » Sponsored » Pi Speakers » PiAlign questions: ideal vs enclosure Q (and Kappa15LF looks sweet!)
PiAlign questions: ideal vs enclosure Q (and Kappa15LF looks sweet!) [message #34276] Wed, 28 November 2001 05:49 Go to next message
AudioLapDance is currently offline  AudioLapDance
Messages: 40
Registered: May 2009
Baron
Hey Wayne et all,

I just have the left tweeter crossover to finish on my Theater Seven Pis.

Goodness Gracious!!!

These things can play loud and clean! When cranked the bass blurs my vision and the percussion is so sharp it feels like you're getting slapped in the face (but no sibilance)! Air guitar is impossible to resist! I could go on and on ... Wayne, you da man!

When using PiAlign I sometimes notice a huge difference between ideal Q and encl Q.

Ex:

Rat Shack 1197
Fs=85Hz
Qt=0.37, Qd=2.7
Vad=0.17 cuft (4.9 l)
Ideal Q=40
Encl Q=10

Eminence Kappa15LF
Fs=39Hz
Qt=0.38, Qd=2.6
Vad=5.6 cuft (159 l)
Ideal Q=19.5
Encl Q=6.6

Wayne, what's going on? Is it possible to get closer to the ideal Q or is the calculated encl Q as close as it gets? How does this affect performance?

By the way, the Kappa15LF may be the road to a poor man's Pro Four Pi (small cab JBL 2226 kick ass speaker). PiAlign gives a 25.5" x 17.5" x 12" cab with a 4.6" diam x 10" port (LDF vol=300, wood=1.5). The Kappa15LF has good Xmax (5.5mm), OK Zmax (86) and low Qms (6 so no mud motor!). The freq response looks good (no big peak at 2k) but the high Le (1.27mH) will require a zobel. Wayne, maybe you should audition a few pairs and see if you want to offer them as an official Pi product. :-)

Cheers,
Jeff


Re: PiAlign questions: ideal vs enclosure Q (and Kappa15LF looks sweet!) [message #34277 is a reply to message #34276] Wed, 28 November 2001 08:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam is currently offline  Adam
Messages: 419
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (1st Degree)
Sounds good dude, I'm looking forward to getting my pi's done with the Kappa 15LFA's... But one thing. It actually does have massive peaking at 1.7 and 2 kHz. The peaks are as much as 10 db higher from reference.

Thought I'd let ya know.

Adam

Which graph to trust? [message #34278 is a reply to message #34277] Wed, 28 November 2001 09:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
AudioLapDance is currently offline  AudioLapDance
Messages: 40
Registered: May 2009
Baron
Hey Adam,

I saw Colin's K15LF freq resp graph below. He indicated that he received it from a DIY buddy at Eminence. The graph on the Em website doesn't have the peak but they both show that the sensitivity is ~95dB (where did they get 101dB for the spec sheet?!?) As Wayne points out, these graphs aren't very consistent so maybe the actual response lies somewhere in between?

I guess we'll have to trust our ears.

Good luck with the Pis. Let us know how it turns out.

Cheers,
Jeff

Re: Which graph to trust? [message #34279 is a reply to message #34278] Wed, 28 November 2001 09:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Colin Fritzke is currently offline  Colin Fritzke
Messages: 41
Registered: May 2009
Baron
Trust the chart on my webpage. I was very much into going with the Kappa 15LF for the same reasons you suggested, but upon closer inspection of an actual FR plot, I decided against it because there is no way Wayne's standard Four Pi Crossover will deal with those peaks at 1.7K and 2K. They could be tamed, but that would require some drastic measures and I have neither the tools nor the patience to do it. Eminence sensitivity specs are high because they rate the sensitivity of their drivers at 1kHz.

Wanna get some Kilomax 15's? I know of a source that can get them for not too much more than you'd pay for the Kappas....

Colin

PiAlign answers: ideal vs enclosure Q [message #34280 is a reply to message #34276] Wed, 28 November 2001 16:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne Parham is currently online  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18786
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)
PiAlign is a very old program and some of its terms are unusual. Enclosure Q is a term I used to describe port choking. What I was trying to do was to balance port tuning with its resistance to flow given the size constraints of what could physically be put inside the box.
Re: Which graph to trust? [message #34283 is a reply to message #34279] Thu, 29 November 2001 18:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
LuxmanLover is currently offline  LuxmanLover
Messages: 164
Registered: May 2009
Master
I noticed the same thng about the Kappa 15lf's when I ran them in Unibox.... the rated efficiency was a whopping 101 db but Unibox gave it 95db which struck me as weird 'cause Unibox is usually very close if not right on what the manufacture's stated numbers usually are.
Kelly
Re: Which graph to trust? [message #34288 is a reply to message #34283] Fri, 30 November 2001 12:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam is currently offline  Adam
Messages: 419
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (1st Degree)
Well Eminence told me themselves that they overstated the sensitivity ratings on most of their woofers to compete with competitors who do the same... Hmm...

Colin, WHERE on earth are you getting kilo's for the same price as kappas? I'd love to know...

Adam

Re: Which graph to trust? [message #34289 is a reply to message #34288] Fri, 30 November 2001 13:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Colin Fritzke is currently offline  Colin Fritzke
Messages: 41
Registered: May 2009
Baron
Adam,

See this thread: http://www.AudioRoundTable.com/PiSpeakers/messages/1871.html. The price he quoted me is in Canadian dollars, so that converts to approximately $143 US each. Not bad, eh?

George got them for me here in Canada (He's in Toronto and I'm in Calgary). Those are his Premium Stage Four Pi's w/Kilomax 15's in the picture above.

Colin


Re: Which graph to trust? [message #34290 is a reply to message #34278] Fri, 30 November 2001 13:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adam is currently offline  Adam
Messages: 419
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (1st Degree)
I find that strange... I'm pretty sure I can hear a peak in the 2 kHz region during listening tests (with no crossover), I can't say that it's as huge as 10-12 db though!

I can surmise that the Delta probably has a similar response to the Kappa. Wayne is using 2nd order on the woofer for that design, and I haven't heard complaints. Perhaps the peak isn't as large as I thought, and the crossover is dealing with it. I'm not really sure what would explain those peaks, either.

I was thinking of using third order or even fourth on the woofer, but changed my mind. I've been using a crossover for Kappa LFA and 2002 2-ways nearly identical to Wayne's in every respect (coincidence, I assure you... :)), except the crossover is at 1.5 kHz and it doesn't have the bypass cap on the l-pad to lift the upper frequency range. So I'm just gonna use stock parts and use my design, and add the cap as well. The design sounds pretty good, so I'm gonna ride with it. I've already got four Kappas and four of the compression drivers collecting dust.. Can't turn back now.

I'll definitly let you know how they go. Gonna start soon, hope to have the first pair at least functional in the next couple weeks. Four of these things with 500 watts each is gonna be unbelievable... >:)

Adam

Re: Which graph to trust? [message #34291 is a reply to message #34289] Fri, 30 November 2001 13:25 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Adam is currently offline  Adam
Messages: 419
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (1st Degree)
Get outta here... that's like 220 cdn... and I'm in London (which is about three hours from toronto)!!! How aboot that eh... lol.

I'll have to look into that... Wanna buy four Kappa 15LFA's??? :D Mint condition.

Previous Topic: closed vs. vented sub-woofer box
Next Topic: Replay.. check your e-mail
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Nov 21 12:35:09 CST 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest