2A3 (Paramour) / Thermo et al [message #33665] |
Mon, 13 August 2001 07:20 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd0ac/bd0ac06bc0716245c70e1d7ca4a193e4fbe25374" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
JmttG
Messages: 4 Registered: May 2009
|
Esquire |
|
|
Hi Wayne, Thank you for your recent email. I plan to built a 2A3 amp (3.5watts) I have read the threads and still don't get the difference between the Studio and Thermionic line of tweeters. Which is best for the 2A3 amp? --or-- are both just fine ? Thanks! JmttG
|
|
|
|
Re: Compression vs. piezo tweeters [message #33668 is a reply to message #33666] |
Mon, 13 August 2001 17:38 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/413e0/413e00f5cba1f3b2b5107f9dcfe0ee2b05c7be55" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd0ac/bd0ac06bc0716245c70e1d7ca4a193e4fbe25374" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
JmttG
Messages: 4 Registered: May 2009
|
Esquire |
|
|
Thank you Wayne. The studio line offers an inexpensive, compact spacewise solution, in which case the piezo device is appropriate. Right? One more question before I order: With the 2A3 3.5W amp, would either speaker offer more transparency, or pose problems for such an amp? Many thanks again! Matthew
|
|
|
|