Home » Audio » Group Build » RIAA preamp?
RIAA preamp? [message #30375] Thu, 03 February 2005 11:39 Go to next message
Damir is currently offline  Damir
Messages: 1005
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)

Hey, just a thought - oversized PS with free 2x300V winding, big chasis - why not put RIAA preamp inside, selectable to the input (100k pot) of the line preamp?
I tinkered for a few hours about this idea today - I tried to be as simple as possible ("all in one go" EQ, just one double triode), and without "exotic", hard to find values for the RIAA EQ - R1, R2, C1, C2. The little "trick" is to find the C1 cap with little lower value then standard 10nF, about 9,76 nF (not a big problem actually, most of the standard 10 & 20 % caps I tried are little lower in value). Then, with our RIAA equations: R1C1=2187uS, R1C2=750uS, R2C1=318uS, C1/C2=2,916 we can find:
R1=224 kOhms - our Rout from the first stage is about 3k, and we can use standard E96 value, 221k/1% (even E24 value 220k with small selection)
R2=32,58 kOhms - little tricky, we can select between some 33k resistors, or use some cobination, or just use E96 value 32,4k
C2=3,347 nF - "input" capacitance of the second stage is about 47pF, and just use standard 3,3nF cap of your choice (2,5% tol. if possible)
If we want to use this preamp to drive more then few cm of cable, then we can use active DN2540 load for R7=15k, and use low imp. out.
Theoretical amplification is about 80 times/1k, more then enough for "normal" MM cartridges + our line stage.

Well, this is just some thoughts/computing/simulations (almost perfect, of course:-)). Is not a problem to build it, problem is that I don`t have the quality measuring devices to actually try RIAA accuracy:-(. Maybe...hm...Doug?
And, BTW - some other tubes besides E188/7308 can be implemented, probably E180CC, maybe 6N1P or so... Both triodes work with rel. high current, Ia1=10mA, Ia2=9,5mA.
Thoughts?

Re: RIAA preamp? [message #30376 is a reply to message #30375] Thu, 03 February 2005 13:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
Nice idea; what about shielding?

Re: RIAA preamp? [message #30377 is a reply to message #30376] Thu, 03 February 2005 14:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Damir is currently offline  Damir
Messages: 1005
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Not so sure what you mean, maybe shielded cable? I`d build it close to the input pot, just a few cm of wire. Tube socket can be PTFE material or so + tube shield...
I posted this schematic in hope that some discussion can be made... at the end, maybe someone actually build it and try it... I hope that direct coupling between the stages have more advantages then flaws... then cathode decoupling cap C3 (220uF/160V-probably electrolitic) hasn`t large negative impact on sound (can be avoid with active load and Mu-out), etc.


Re: RIAA preamp? [message #30378 is a reply to message #30377] Thu, 03 February 2005 15:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
I would like to combine the two and get rid of one box on the shelf.

Re: RIAA preamp? [message #30447 is a reply to message #30375] Fri, 11 February 2005 08:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PakProtector is currently offline  PakProtector
Messages: 935
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Well, it looks good to me. I have a few ideas. First is to use a Guinevere-style plate load on the final stage. It offers the high drive capability and a little more free gain without interfering with the RIAA parameters.

Second, I'd suggest the 6BQ7A/6BK7B valve. It is inexpensivew and a little higher gain. Cg-a is comaprable to any of the mentioned alternatives.
regards,
Douglas

Re: RIAA preamp? [message #30467 is a reply to message #30447] Fri, 11 February 2005 14:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Damir is currently offline  Damir
Messages: 1005
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Close enough to ECC180 and then close enough to E180CC I suggested?:-)
I hope that I`ll find some time to breadbord E188CC version first and see is it good enough. If yes, E180CC (and little correction for ECC180/6BQ7-A if necessary) is in order... I just don`t have the instruments good enough for checking RIAA accuracy, that`s the problem. Any idea? Any desire to breadbord it?

something like it.... [message #30475 is a reply to message #30467] Fri, 11 February 2005 15:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PakProtector is currently offline  PakProtector
Messages: 935
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
I am going to try for a two-stage valve pre for MC. Cascode of the front end stage. Probably a pair of triode strapped, high gm pentodes. Get the first stage gain in neighborhood of 200:1 and feed the RIAA filter and end with a CCS-loaded 6BQ7 perhaps. Getting half or a third of mu-squared from a cascode is not too difficult I think.

the troubles I can see from here are mainly the high output z of the cascode stage and the correspondingly high z RIAA EQ. The Guinevere-style plate load will do a good job of driving cables.

I may decide to put in a variable capacitance in the front, as the cascode will be nearly free of Miller effects.

Still looking at it.
regards,
Douglas

That and noise....heh-heh-heh!

6EJ7 [message #30476 is a reply to message #30375] Fri, 11 February 2005 18:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
PakProtector is currently offline  PakProtector
Messages: 935
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Hey-Hey!!!,
Been looking at the sheet to the EF184/6EJ7. Nice, mu ov 60 and gm of 15 mA/V in triode connection. That leaves a plate z of 4k, which is acceptable.

Do you know of a sheet with its triode curves? With that I could generate the cascode plate curves and see what gain I could realize. mu-squared is unbelievable ( 3600 ). If I could get 10% of that I'd be in business.
regards,
Douglas


Re: 6EJ7/EF184 [message #30485 is a reply to message #30476] Sat, 12 February 2005 06:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Damir is currently offline  Damir
Messages: 1005
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Hey, of course, here`s the link - www pages by Tom Schlangen (sometimes it is useful to read rec.audio.tubes threads :-)), down there: "Tubes Technical data".
Don`t tell anybody, but IMO - EF184 is cheap, linear and plentifull - I have some TFK, Valvo and Siemens.

Re: 6EJ7 cascode A [message #30491 is a reply to message #30476] Sat, 12 February 2005 14:27 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Damir is currently offline  Damir
Messages: 1005
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
You probably know this, but just in case... Amplification of the cascode is A=gm*Ra, just like in pentode, where gm is gm of "compound device, quasy pentode", or A~gm1*Ra , where gm1 is transconductance of the lower triode, IME - always gives a little "optimistic" values. With unbypassed Rk, gm1`~gm/3, and with Ra~8k2 - A~40.
Of course, there are "full" formulas for this ("Valve Amplifiers", RDH, "Vacuum tube amplifiers"). For complicated cascode versions there`s always SPICE (hey, I have EF184 pentode 3f4 model - if you feel desire for it...).
I also thought about cascode RIAA, but that Rout...

Previous Topic: 6v6v6
Next Topic: Does anyone want me to go thru grounding? (nt)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Dec 01 16:23:44 CST 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest