A little carping [message #2971] |
Mon, 10 April 2006 18:52 |
Manualblock
Messages: 4973 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (13th Degree) |
|
|
I was just reading some TT threads on another popular audio forum site. I have to pitch a bitch here about a couple things. First up; the guy posts asking about the comparison between the Shure M97 ed and the Audio Technica AT 440. There were eighteen replies; I kid you not and geuss what? Not one answered the question. There were replies that explained all kinds of stuff about mass and compliance; most of it slightly wrong; some of it really wrong. Some guys offered the advice to use coins on the headshell to help with tracking. There were stories about old tables people had known and loved; there were some good links to stuff that had nothing to do with the question; some had nothing to do with audio. Finally the guy just said he bought the AT 440 and thanks but no thanks.Maybe I am old fashioned but I think it's good to make posts that deal with the question at hand; but I notice there is a tendancy to do this; reply with all kinds of irrelevant info; useless analogies and disconnected narratives that have nothing to do with the question at hand. Or nice lengthy descriptions of things the reply person has owned since 1930 or pictures of his living room. I find it frustrating when a simple answer completely eludes an entire group of forum participants. This guy still has no idea if the Shure is maybe a better choice for him. What a shame. Because in that arm the Shure probably was a better choice. And no one mentioned cementing the stylus to the headshell; which is a major improvement on every cartridge I have ever heard in the under 100$ range. I promise to try and offer an answer if I think I might be able to help someone that deals with the specific question the poor guy asked. I'd love to see that become a common practice. Also that people actually read the post and think of what the question is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: A little carping [message #2975 is a reply to message #2971] |
Tue, 11 April 2006 07:39 |
GarMan
Messages: 960 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (2nd Degree) |
|
|
Yeah, it really annoying how some people get so off topic with posts. Ruins the whole discussion. It's too bad ..."we can’t bust heads like we used to, but we have our ways. One trick is to tell 'em stories that don’t go anywhere -- like the time I caught the ferry over to Shelbyville. I needed a new heel for my shoe, so, I decided to go to Morganville, which is what they called Shelbyville in those days. So I tied an onion to my belt, which was the style at the time. Now, to take the ferry cost a nickel, and in those days, nickels had pictures of bumblebees on 'em. 'Give me five bees for a quarter,' you’d say. "Now where were we? Oh yeah -- the important thing was that I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time. They didn’t have white onions because of the war. The only thing you could get was those big yellow ones..."
|
|
|
Re: A little carping [message #2976 is a reply to message #2974] |
Tue, 11 April 2006 07:45 |
Manualblock
Messages: 4973 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (13th Degree) |
|
|
The beauty of all this is it makes you realise how much we miss things like the nightly news that has standards to follow. They may have not been perfect, but it was a whole lot better than a "Bunch of Demented Blogs." Sorry; off topic, but it relates to our conversation in a roundabout sort of way.I see now that the really serious forums are charging a member fee. 10$ seems to be the usual rate. Not a bad idea. keeps the floaters out. But I geuss then if you want to be noticed it doesn't help to be locked down. And one more thing; how much can you write about audio anyway? Thats why keeping the music section alive is so important. That changes and as such provides fodder for new ideas.
|
|
|
|
Re: A little carping [message #2978 is a reply to message #2976] |
Wed, 12 April 2006 22:46 |
lon
Messages: 760 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (2nd Degree) |
|
|
I would say the thing to do is what I suggested on here: ask the racquonteurs (sp?) when they last got their hearing checked. At least it would slow them down. But I only come on here and DIY audio/Full Range and Full Range Driver forum.
There's not much spin or wandering around on those. I dropped off Madisound and Parts Express and was never much connected with audio asylum which everyone seems to hate anyways.
The real dedicated project guys seem to be on those other two: the threads go to 500 entries and all meaningful.
|
|
|
Re: A little carping [message #2979 is a reply to message #2978] |
Thu, 13 April 2006 06:46 |
Manualblock
Messages: 4973 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (13th Degree) |
|
|
Yes; there are quite a few serious sites. DIY Tube, Joelist, I have them saved. It would be nice to have a good audio site that could provide all things to all people. So far that doesn't seem to be happening. Either they are very serious about a single topic full of guys who are dedicated to that one thing in which case you can't participate on any meaningfull level. Or they are silly. Or they are predjudicial towards certain points of view and refuse to entertain anything that doesn't co-respond to their thinking. Then there is a case to be made that most of what can possibly be written or discussed regarding hobbies like this is already done to death. So where to go in terms of encouraging a meaningfull dialogue that pertains to things audio and that has a different slant or something original to offer. I can say what I think doesn't work; but it is hard to figure on what does work. We know the Stereophile model is not what anyone wants to read. Endless reviews of equipment and fetishistic photography of amps and speakers gets old real quick. But long technical posts involving one tiny aspect of a small percentage of interest doesn't sound so great either.I know I like when people involve good stories that revolve around audio and building equipment and music and what it means in their life and personal philosophy. But there isn't much of that since Sound Practices went under.
|
|
|
|