Home » Audio » General » How would consumers re-difine audio re-production?
Re: What changed? [message #2453 is a reply to message #2448] Wed, 16 November 2005 08:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18793
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)

Thanks, John, that was really nice of you to say.


Re: What changed? [message #2454 is a reply to message #2453] Wed, 16 November 2005 08:24 Go to previous message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
Only the truth; my friend. I just hope it is taken seriously in regards to the existing discussion because I think it has meritt.
When someone hits on a philosophy that provides a possible bridge to the mainstream it should be celebrated.
Were the average Home Theater buff to hear this set-up; they would be shocked at whats possible. Real music instead of that bombastic noise they are used to. Man some of these retail set-ups can cause physical pain with their frequency disttortion.
But I don't see a large percentage of purchasers spending upwards of 4-5K for speakers. Here they get 95% of the sound for 1/10th of the price. And that should be recognised as pertinent to the issue at hand.

Previous Topic: We should call "Craftsman" the "Maytag Forum"
Next Topic: Hat's off to Steve Brown for a great day!
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Dec 23 09:22:10 CST 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest