If you ... [message #23918] |
Fri, 31 August 2007 18:27 |
Rick Craig
Messages: 115 Registered: May 2009
|
Viscount |
|
|
... want to build an array what kind of budget would you have?
|
|
|
|
|
Re: If you ... [message #23922 is a reply to message #23921] |
Sat, 01 September 2007 10:49 |
Marlboro
Messages: 403 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (1st Degree) |
|
|
What are you hoping to accomplish with a new design that wasn't already accomplished with the designs you currently sell? I should think that you would need to have specific goals in mind before you get started. I did.
|
|
|
|
I'm confused..... [message #23924 is a reply to message #23923] |
Mon, 03 September 2007 03:06 |
Rex
Messages: 4 Registered: May 2009
|
Esquire |
|
|
How is this different than say your XT8's, with your Citrine sub woofers adjusted slightly? It would seem that by adjusting the crossover you would already have what you are proposing to build. I'm confused.
|
|
|
Re: I'm confused..... [message #23925 is a reply to message #23924] |
Mon, 03 September 2007 08:29 |
Rick Craig
Messages: 115 Registered: May 2009
|
Viscount |
|
|
This is very different from the XT8. The goal here is not to "beat" the other arrays in performance but to offer a less costly alternative that will perform very well. The tradeoffs: 1) Lower sensitivity than our other arrays (88-91db target) 2) Higher crossover point to the subwoofer (100-150hz) 3) Less Sd (surface area) due to the smaller woofers Advantages: 1) Lower cost 2) More tweeter choices to meet different budgets 3) Symmetrical coverage 4) Smaller cabinet footprint with less weight 5) Options for system impedance
|
|
|
More questions? [message #23926 is a reply to message #23925] |
Mon, 03 September 2007 10:58 |
Rex
Messages: 4 Registered: May 2009
|
Esquire |
|
|
Do you plan to offer it as a kit like some of the others? What mid ranges have you selected as possible choices to reduce cost? Why does "symmetrical coverage" mean? How many tweeters? And how many mid's do you think you will use? Will it be a passive crossover design or an active design? Do you expect to use separate cabinets for each of the mids or one giant cabinet for all? Rex
|
|
|
|
Re: More questions? [message #23929 is a reply to message #23928] |
Mon, 03 September 2007 13:16 |
Rick Craig
Messages: 115 Registered: May 2009
|
Viscount |
|
|
Thanks for your kind comments. I tend to prefer the sealed arrays because it allows for a more compact cabinet and good integratiion with subwoofers. Ported arrays are fine provided you have a woofer that can give you good low end extension with a -3db point in the low to mid 40's. There are very few 5" drivers that will do that without active EQ so that's why I often suggest a 7" for ported arrays. Of course the cabinet size increases quite a bit so you have to keep that in mind. Open baffle arrays present different challenges and in order to cross over to a subwoofer you need to apply a great deal of equalization. You also need a fairly wide baffle and for many wives this isn't possible There's also the problem of making it stable because all of the weight is at the front of the cabinet. There are also some design issues to overcome in terms of room response. Having worked with the Eton drivers I think you'll find them better suited to a closed box versus open baffle.
|
|
|