|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: rs 180 plot (nt) [message #23867 is a reply to message #23864] |
Wed, 11 July 2007 19:35 |
Rick Craig
Messages: 115 Registered: May 2009
|
Viscount |
|
|
The graph isn't fully representative of how the driver measures. If you look at the response curve on the Parts Express site you'll get a better idea of how it performs. There are also some positive reviews on the PE site from other people who have used the woofer. Being an aluminum cone the upper end breakup is the main issue to deal with; however, as long as the crossover point it low and the acoustic slope is steep the driver will perform well. Being a stiff cone the upper bass / lower mids will not be as "full" or "warm" as soft cone drivers; however, many people feel this is more accurate with greater resolution. Others may react differently and suggest that the sound is too "dry" or "sterile". I don't think this is a right or wrong issue but more of a matter of preference. I have shared both opinions depending on the recording. Yes, there are better 7" woofers but for the $ many people feel this one if hard to beat.
|
|
|
Re: Bad Recordings? [message #23868 is a reply to message #23865] |
Wed, 11 July 2007 19:50 |
Rick Craig
Messages: 115 Registered: May 2009
|
Viscount |
|
|
I do take this very seriously and want to help you attain the sound that you are desiring to achieve. Having spent several years in recording live sound I can attest that microphones and studio effects can affect vocals in a negative way. With female vocals the ribbons can be quite revealing of sibilance and the crossover point /slope / EQ settings are critical to good performance. This is also at the upper end of the woofer's response where the breakup occurs and it needs to be fully attenuated. There are some latex damping compounds that could be applied to the cone; however, be careful to avoid anything with a solvent that could affect the cone adhesives. A water-based material is going to be the best solution and the same amount must be applied to every driver to maintain the same cone mass.
|
|
|
Re: Bad Recordings? [message #23869 is a reply to message #23865] |
Thu, 12 July 2007 20:55 |
Tom R.
Messages: 51 Registered: May 2009
|
Baron |
|
|
JP - I fully understand your position, you took the time to build them thinking it was a proven design, but the initial sound came up a little short of where you thought it would be….Tom R
|
|
|
|