|
|
Issues? [message #23461 is a reply to message #23460] |
Wed, 21 February 2007 13:48 |
Marlboro
Messages: 403 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (1st Degree) |
|
|
I'm afraid I have to disagree with the substance of your comments about line arrays, your interpretations of the Griffin paper, and your arrogant confrontational style of interacting on-line. However, its the last disagreement which prompts me not to respond to anything you should say in the future. I'm not interested in interacting with people who believe that the best way to win an argument with someone is to start in by insulting them. Better to provide substance for discussion rather than attacking people as a way of offering discussion. I've done nothing to you to invoke such VIRULENT IRE, so I must conclude you have issues that I am not involved in. Good luck in your struggles. Kind regards, Marlboro
|
|
|
Since You are so knowledgeable..... [message #23462 is a reply to message #23459] |
Wed, 21 February 2007 13:56 |
Marlboro
Messages: 403 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (1st Degree) |
|
|
Ivor, Perhaps since you are so knowledgeable about this subject you would share what the essential elements in a line array designed for the interior of a dwelling are. You know: numero 1, numero 2, numero 3, etc. Then we could all be enlightened, and we would have assurance that you really want to discuss and are not just looking for a way to start a flame war. Right now your virulent ire toward someone who didn't describe something in the way you would like is way out of proportion to normal internet conversation. Kind regards, Marlboro
|
|
|
|
|
|
You were wrong. Period. Live with it. [message #23481 is a reply to message #23462] |
Mon, 26 February 2007 10:22 |
Ivor the Engine Driver
Messages: 18 Registered: May 2009
|
Chancellor |
|
|
I hardly expressed "virulent ire" at you. However, if I hurt your feelings by pointing out that you were wrong in your definition of an array, well, then I'm sorry your feelings were hurt by my pointing out that you were wrong. And if I unknowingly violated some pansy rule of debate here at Arrays-R-Us by using the truth, then I'm also sorry that such rules are in place.
|
|
|
I don't agree with your interpretations, or your attitude. Live with it. [message #23483 is a reply to message #23481] |
Mon, 26 February 2007 10:52 |
Marlboro
Messages: 403 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (1st Degree) |
|
|
I know. You subscribe to the "I'll talk to anyone, in any way I damn well please" rule. And, the "if you don't like it leave" rule. I wasn't wrong and my feelings are not hurt. I just don't choose to insult people as a way of disagreeing. Its a style of interacting, and one that in real life causes suspensions in public school, and assault charges because of fights. I doubt whether you would talk that way to someone you know, or to a fellow employee at work. But since you don't have to interract with anyone here in real life, you figure you can say anything in any way you want. In my own forum, you would have been banned for inappropriate language. Its your life. Do what you want, I'm sure you will unless someone steps in and stops you.
|
|
|
I'll try [message #23487 is a reply to message #23483] |
Mon, 26 February 2007 15:48 |
Ivor the Engine Driver
Messages: 18 Registered: May 2009
|
Chancellor |
|
|
> I don't agree with your interpretations, or your > attitude. Live with it.It'll be rough not having the support of the Smartest Man Alive Who Is Never Wrong, but I'll give it a whirl.
|
|
|