Home » Audio » Speaker » Inspired by the McIntosh XRT2K
Re: Inspired by the McIntosh XRT2K [message #23406 is a reply to message #23403] Wed, 24 January 2007 10:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
Send me an email if you want more feedback.

I don't know the story on picture #26.

Re: Inspired by the McIntosh XRT2K [message #23407 is a reply to message #23397] Wed, 24 January 2007 16:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
auplater is currently offline  auplater
Messages: 4
Registered: May 2009
Esquire
I dunno... I've had pretty good luck with the RD-75's (but paid less than half they're going rate)...
I only run them as enhanced midrange (see below)

http://www.audioroundtable.com/ArraySpeakers/messages/1281.html

AS such, there's virtually NO cross driver interference (limited only to horizontal plane), the planars are FAST, and the imaging is spectacular.

total cost per speaker was ~$700 US.

Re: Inspired by the McIntosh XRT2K [message #23408 is a reply to message #23407] Wed, 24 January 2007 16:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Anonymous
>but paid less than half they're going rate

This is an exception. Those drivers new cost about $1500 a pair,
therefore I can find something better for that budget. I wouldn't
spend that kind of money for RD75, I'd want more performance for
that kind of coin.



Re: Inspired by the McIntosh XRT2K [message #23409 is a reply to message #23400] Wed, 24 January 2007 17:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Marlboro
Messages: 403
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (1st Degree)
I didn't want you to get the idea that I agreed with blocking the woofers, I don't. But you could make it work, I suppose.

And why do you haved to have a 2 way crossing at 350hz?

I don't agree with spending the amount of money you are talking about, and compromising the array in the way you have done. I mean $1500 for the tweeters?

I don't understand.

Email me and we'll talk about it off-line.

marlboro

Re: Inspired by the McIntosh XRT2K [message #23410 is a reply to message #23405] Thu, 25 January 2007 03:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Attila is currently offline  Attila
Messages: 8
Registered: May 2009
Esquire
Zaph was the place - thanks! The Aurasound cougar looks a bit rough, but that may be the measuring procedure of Zaph stressing it to hard. I think he tests at 90db/0.5m, right?

Still, sensitivity and more importantly max SPL will go up considerably with close to 50 drivers, and 90 looks about right for 2.83v/1m for 45 of them. This may work, but it will require some quite serious amplification - reacing peak at 20w/driver means 900w dissipated for an SPL of 97db at 1 meter. This is still a bit on the low side, and 11db lower than the RD75 at peak power (400w).

I am not writing this of, but dynamic headroom is important. And based on these numbers the savings from going with the cheaper drivers may not outweigh the costs in terms of less headroom and much more work in building the things...

Re: Inspired by the McIntosh XRT2K [message #23411 is a reply to message #23407] Thu, 25 January 2007 03:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Attila is currently offline  Attila
Messages: 8
Registered: May 2009
Esquire
auplater,

Interesting setup! Could I ask if you have tested the RD75's to see how far they can go upwards and downwards? I see that you got some advise from ThomasW to cross relatively high to the HDS182's, but there are quite a few reports of good results down below 300. Any experience with this?

Also, have you tried EQing the RD75's to get them (closer to) flat up to 20k?

700/speaker is not bad BTW - I have a feeling I am looking at the wrong side of 2k per speaker. Still, should be worth it!

Re: Inspired by the McIntosh XRT2K [message #23412 is a reply to message #23410] Thu, 25 January 2007 05:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
justinc is currently offline  justinc
Messages: 32
Registered: May 2009
Baron
with 45 of them 900w of power will give you an spl of over 127db, but you will have reached their xmax. you only need 100 watts of power to reach 120db spl and come close to reaching xmax.

Re: Inspired by the McIntosh XRT2K [message #23413 is a reply to message #23412] Thu, 25 January 2007 06:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Attila is currently offline  Attila
Messages: 8
Registered: May 2009
Esquire
At 120db from this I think there would be some cones flying! If my thinking is not completely off (that happens!), reaching 120db with 1 line of 45 drivers would require a total of 45000 watts - that is a bit more than my fuses can handle...

The 90db sensitivity rating for 1w/1m with 45 drivers is a bit misleading. This is a measure for the SPL with 1w energy dissipated for each driver. The SPL for 1w total energy dissipation does not change, that remains at 74db/1m (according to Zaph), only it is now generated by 45 drivers burning off 1/45w each. The real gain is in lower distortion and more headroom. It is more meaningful (although not very precise due to impedance variation over frequency) to use the SPL @ 2.83v/1m measure here, as 2.83v across all 45 drivers will produce around 90db/1m.

Anyway, you are right in that my number was too low, it should be around 103,5 max SPL with 20w/driver peak. That is actually less than 5db off the RD75, so this may not be so bad. More thinking required!

Re: Inspired by the McIntosh XRT2K [message #23414 is a reply to message #23413] Thu, 25 January 2007 15:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
justinc is currently offline  justinc
Messages: 32
Registered: May 2009
Baron
Im really not sure about technical details I just plug the values into bassbox and modeled it and thats what I got My understanding though is since the drivers will be spaced about 1" apart the wave pattern in a line array is summative up to about 14,000hz where it will then start to decline. Here's the info I found about how bassbox calculates values.

When multiple drivers are used, the sound waves emanating from them will combine to create a composite sound wave that is louder. BassBox Pro assumes that the drivers are all the same kind and, in most cases, that they are driven with identical signals so that their sound waves will usually sum coherently. This means that the net sound level will increase 6 dB with every doubling of drivers.

However, there may be occasions when the sound waves do not add coherently and the “Drivers do NOT add coherently” option should be turned on. In these cases the net sound level will increase only 3 dB for every doubling of drivers. The following list describes situations when coherent additions will not happen. Turn on the “Drivers do NOT add coherently” option for these situations:

• The drivers will not sum coherently if they are wired separately and are driven with different signals. For example, two woofers are mounted in a common cabinet but one is driven from a left stereo signal and the other is driven from a right stereo channel.
• The drivers will not sum coherently if they are mounted too far apart. Their center-to-center spacing should be no greater than one quarter (¼) wavelength for the frequencies in their passband. This is usually not a problem for subwoofers because they are driven only with low-frequencies having long wavelengths. For example, many subwoofers use a crossover frequency of 100 Hz or less—the wavelength of 100 Hz is 136 inches (345 cm). As long as the drivers reproduce frequencies that are not higher than 100 Hz then the drivers in the subwoofer can be mounted as far as 34 inches (86 cm) apart because this is one quarter of 136 inches.

Re: Inspired by the McIntosh XRT2K [message #23415 is a reply to message #23411] Thu, 25 January 2007 19:20 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
auplater is currently offline  auplater
Messages: 4
Registered: May 2009
Esquire

I did try running them swept up to ~16K or so... pretty much followed the response found online on numerous forums... hence the panasonic supertweeter... down lower I didn't need as the peerless midwoofs are smooth up to > 1Khz and have plenty of wallop (>108dB @ 15 feet listening position)...

rather than pushing the RD75's w/eq, I added the ATC neoplanar 25's I found on ebay for ~$175 ea. they're good past 20Khz, @ ~92 - 93 db/w.. handle 150W RMS...had to pad them down abit to match the RD75's.

I would have probably built using only the neoplanars had I found them first, but this setup sounds incredible as is.. so I'm a happy camper... keep your eyes out for these planars... not withstanding the nay-sayers... I can never go back to pisstonic cone speakers (other than bass and subs) after building and hearing these line source dipoles... the imaging is staggeringly rock solid and lifelike...

Previous Topic: Needles a Great Success!
Next Topic: Word document for cutting flange of Neo Tweeters
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Nov 27 08:18:04 CST 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest