Home » Audio » Speaker » Acoustic treatment and the nearfield Question
Re: Acoustic treatment and the nearfield Question [message #23300 is a reply to message #23294] Mon, 06 November 2006 19:08 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Duke is currently offline  Duke
Messages: 297
Registered: May 2009
Grand Master
In my opinion you are absolutely correct - the "near field" extends considerably farther back from a line source speaker than from a point source speaker. Remember the name of the company that made the Pipe Dreams? "Nearfield Acoustics".

I would guess that the nearfield extends about 10 or 12 feet from a line source speaker, whereas it extends about 5 or 6 feet from a point source speaker. This is strictly a SWAG (so correct me, Jim!).

Anyway Marlboro, I would still want to diffuse or (if necessary) absorb the first sidewall reflections, as they are the ones most likely to be detrimental to imaging. The floor and ceiling bounce are usually the reflections most likely to cause tonal coloration, but the directional properties of a line source take them out of the picture.

Something else a line source gives you - a wider sweet spot. The loudness discrepancy between the two speakers is less for off-axis listeners, so you get good soundstaging across a wider listening area.

Just my $.02.

Duke

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Needle Array
Next Topic: Baffle Step Roll-off, electronics crosses, and ARRAYs
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Aug 15 14:45:25 CDT 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest