Is it my imagination .....OR [message #23138] |
Mon, 28 August 2006 07:35 |
Pinky
Messages: 10 Registered: May 2009
|
Chancellor |
|
|
Is it my imagination, or is knowledge about how how speakers work in an array painfully minimal by those who use the various point source systems? I mean, I have contacted and asked questions of very knowledgeable people and gotten great answers but when I bring up that I'm using the speakers in a line array, their knowledge of all of the factors that make combining the speakers (spl, smoothing of frequency response, dramatically lowered distortion, need to place the speakers very close together vertically and horizontally regarding comb filtering. etc) seems to disappear. Its like the array domain of speaker design is its own little shangra-la valley that others cannot find their way into. I even had someone tell me that they didn't like arrays because the sound stage was TOO BIG. I guess if you are only listening to single person guitar music, suddenly someone takes you to your first symphony concert with its 40 foot stage, one would find it to be "TOO BIG"? I guess its comforting to know which speaker the sound is coming out of. And then there is the issue of the expense of the individual speakers. I'm not suggesting that its possible to take a some 49 cent woofers, and some 79 cent tweeters and make an array that beats the pants of the expensive woofs and tweets, but when you are only using one woof and one tweet and one mid, then you get a mindset that that says speakers need to be really expensive to get really good sound. As Bill Fitzmaurice says, .....at low volume levels the distortion and frequency response of even the 49 cent mid is pretty good. [and with a little equalization can be made even better]. So when you suggest that you might be using 40 neo tweeters at 5 bucks US a pop, all that is heard is $5, and kerching-kerching, all that is heard is under $30 for the whole kerbang. No, No, No....not possible, fingers in ears, closed mind. Just my thoughts.... hUH? Pinky
|
|
|
|
That's not what I said...but this group is excepted. [message #23140 is a reply to message #23139] |
Mon, 28 August 2006 09:08 |
Pinky
Messages: 10 Registered: May 2009
|
Chancellor |
|
|
I didn't specifically say that no one knew about comb filtering, or that using dirt cheap drivers would produce high quality arrays. I only used these as small examples. Those DIYers who live in the high end world of $250 Revelator tweeters will certainly not agree. I said that there appears to be a general lack of understanding of the elements of array design in the general population of speaker builders. Those with specific EE degrees who specialize in speaker design are usually aware of these issues. Speaker designers whose whole job is designing speakers may or may not be aware of the special characteristics of array speakers---even those with a huge amount of knowledge in the field. Russell is a giant in the field and his interpretation of comb filtering as posted in a previous item here, as well as his 2005 array suggests that all of this is pretty new to him(the array is nice, but it looks like something that was available both commercial and DIY, some time before 2005). It was a generalized comment. Individuals may be in communication with a more enlightened group, I envy them. This group IS EXCEPTED FROM THE OBSERVATION!!! Pinky
|
|
|
|
Two more questions for Bill [message #23142 is a reply to message #23141] |
Mon, 28 August 2006 11:52 |
Pinky
Messages: 10 Registered: May 2009
|
Chancellor |
|
|
Bill, Measurements are almost always made at 1 watt at one meter, correct? Suppose you have twenty in a row, if you measured them individually at 1/20 of a watt, would you see a flattened frequency response? I'm looking for a reason for the flattening effect of the Frequency Response with multiple drivers. And also, I do have to figure that as volume put out by the speaker(I'm sure there is a technical word for this), the power required to move the cone is not linear, so this is the reason why the sensitivity of the speakers increases as a group? So a dismal 83db sensitivity with just one becomes a respectable 93 db with 10, and maybe even over 100 with 20? Sorry for asking you for reasoning for why, but I'm more of a "why does it work guy". I was once drummed out of an NRI TV repair course in the early 80's for asking "too many questions". They sent me my money back because things they said brought other questions to mind about how things worked. I was supposed to take it on principle, and not ask why. Everybody else did that I suppose. But when one knows why, then one can extrapolate further answers and solve further problems. thanks in advance, Pinky
|
|
|
Re: Is it my imagination .....OR [message #23143 is a reply to message #23138] |
Mon, 28 August 2006 19:23 |
Jim Griffin
Messages: 232 Registered: May 2009
|
Master |
|
|
Pinky, Your thinking is just why I researched and wrote my Near Field Line Array white paper. My goal was to establish a structure to what was, at the time, an unstructured state of affairs for line array design. Hopefully, others have benefitted from the guidelines and observations that I suggested. Bottom line is that many people have either built or previously heard line arrays that were not well designed. Hence, they concluded that all line arrays were bad and not worth the trouble to study or implement. My comment is that you really have to hear a well designed line array to appreciate how well they can sound when well designed and implemented. Finally, I agree with you that a line array is one project that can sound better than the sum of the parts because you can virtually eliminate mechanical and thermal compression via the use of multiple drivers. Hence, you can reduce distortion and increase dynamic range and even achieve sensitivity improvement in the mix. You just have to get people to listen to a good array to convince them. Jim
|
|
|
|
SPL measurement Formula? [message #23146 is a reply to message #23145] |
Wed, 30 August 2006 14:08 |
Marlboro
Messages: 403 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (1st Degree) |
|
|
Wayne, Whats the calculation formula? My room isn't 30 meters. In fact my point of listening is only about 4 meters, easily within the near field. M
|
|
|
|
Re: SPL measurement Formula? [message #23150 is a reply to message #23149] |
Wed, 30 August 2006 17:43 |
Marlboro
Messages: 403 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (1st Degree) |
|
|
So then, if you are doing measurement but not of an individual speaker, you might as well just measure where you are seated and get a correct measurement for the whole room, and adjust the equalizer and electronic cross on the basis of the whole effect? Marl
|
|
|