Home » Audio » Speaker » Array Theory
Array Theory [message #22837] Tue, 25 October 2005 08:21 Go to next message
goskers is currently offline  goskers
Messages: 2
Registered: May 2009
Esquire
Hello all,

I am trying to finish an array that I started quite some time ago. While doing as much research on the subject as possible I have some questions that I can't seem to find reasonable answers to.

In regards to the column vs spherical wavefront:

How can the upper ends of a mid/woofer array be limited in vertical dispersion?

Looking at the polar responses in Dr. Griffin's paper the picture supports this but Meyer Sound seems to contradict this for near field listening.

If this is true then the gain offered by the room with reflections to increase the length of the array is questioned as well.

I'm not trying to cause a fuss here, I would just like to know more behind the physics.

Thanks

Re: Array Theory [message #22839 is a reply to message #22837] Tue, 25 October 2005 11:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
lcholke is currently offline  lcholke
Messages: 73
Registered: May 2009
Viscount
How can the upper ends of a mid/woofer array be limited in vertical dispersion?

I think the vertical dispersion limit is for the line wave front. It is also freq dependent. As is near and far field. One good example of this is the sweet spot of a ribbon tweeter. You can hear the fall off above and below the "beam".

-Linc

Re: Array Theory [message #22840 is a reply to message #22837] Tue, 25 October 2005 13:19 Go to previous message
Jim Griffin is currently offline  Jim Griffin
Messages: 232
Registered: May 2009
Master
Goskers,

I would like to reply on your reference to the John Meyer's magazine article. First of all, the 'cylindrical waves' statement is true to a degree. But in the near field the vertical wavefront (created from overlapping outputs from the drivers) is concentrated between the ends of the array--very little energy impinges from the floor and ceiling surfaces. The near field energy flow radiates parallel to these surfaces versus the normal spreading flow from a point source. Furthermore, Meyer's own data does support an average of 3 dB per doubling of distance sound falloff if you look at his data in Table 1 for the 4 and 8 meters distances (practical in-home near field distances unless you live in a castle). Furthermore, John's concerns about high frequency extension are difficult to mitigate for a high power pro sound line array but can be easily overcome via readily available small ribbons and such. Bottom line is that pro sound and in-home line array design/usage are vastly different issues. John's article is good magazine material for a pro sound line array audience but can be a misleading interpretation for an in-home near field array. My work has been focused toward the use of a line array within a typical home situation.

Jim

Previous Topic: Vintage horn pictures
Next Topic: 49 cents 4" fullrange driver from parts express
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Nov 29 16:40:11 CST 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest