Integrating full-range as wide-range [message #21565] |
Mon, 05 June 2006 09:42 |
GarMan
Messages: 960 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (2nd Degree) |
|
|
After listening to my Goodmans Axiette 8 II's for a week, I'm still very impressed by it. However, it's obvious it's missing the very top and bottom end. The top end's easy. I simply added a set of piezos I had lying around, crossed at 10kHz, and the improvement was immediately noticable. What I need help on is integrating the bottom end, specifically cabinet design. I have a pair of JBL 2235, each in its own 5 ft^3 cabinets that I use in my main system. The bass from these are incredible and would complement the Goodmans well. I'm sure I can get "good" bass from the Goodmans with a well aligned cabinet, but it will never be as deep and loud as the JBL's. Questions: If I intend to integrate the Goodmans with the JBLs, can I get away with a simple sealed box? I like to keep the cabinet as small and simple as possible. I know that a larger vented box, or even BLH can extend the bass lower, but what are the advantages of taking the fullrange down to, say, 50Hz if I'm using a "sub"? If the sealed box is okay, what size? There's little to none information on the web about these speakers. From this forum's experience with similar drivers, how low will it go in a sealed enclosure? The drivers currently sit in a 2 ft^3 vented. thx, Gar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Integrating full-range as wide-range [message #21587 is a reply to message #21583] |
Thu, 08 June 2006 21:39 |
akhilesh
Messages: 1275 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (3rd Degree) |
|
|
I applied a highpass on the full range. 24db. That's what the active does. If you want the fullrange to die out naturally, as you know, there are 2 issues at least: 1. WE need to calculate the slope of die out and then calculate the low pass slope on the sub so thee summing is zero ro whatever we want 2. We don't reduce the IM distortion: in my opinion the main advantage to the use of a sub. For example, my trusonic can do 45 hz in its BR box. So if is let it die naturally i'd probably be crossing it at 24 db at around 40 db. But the IM distortion would be the same as without a sub. Crossing it actively at 90 hz takes care of that. It actually sounds significantly better: the results of IM distortion are not the phantom metrics that plague the dreams of many "speaker designers", it's very clearly audible. Hoep this helps -akhilesh
|
|
|
|