Home » Audio » Speaker » Mysteries of Port behavior and design
Mysteries of Port behavior and design [message #20563] Fri, 24 December 2004 10:30 Go to next message
Ron brady is currently offline  Ron brady
Messages: 5
Registered: May 2009
Esquire
Seasons greeting all.
I like to use WinISD Beta to run sims on various drivers. I have successfully used the program to build several designs and have come to trust its accuracy. I have noticed that every simulation ends up with a default vent velocity of .05 to .06 Mach number. It doesn't seem to matter if the driver spl is 80db or 100db. It is safe to assume that the program makes its calculations with the 1watt/1meter values entered in the T/S parameters section for each driver. Changing the spl for the driver doesn't change the vent velocity. I probably never listen to my music at only 1 watt and it is reasonable to assume that the velocity of the vent will increase as the amp is turned up to 4 or 5 watts. This poses a few questions. Is there an optimum vent velocity for my listening level? Is the sound quality of a high velocity vent better or worse or different than a low velocity vent? Is there an optimum group delay? Does a 10ms delay sound better than a 20ms delay? Any thought on the subject would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Ron Brady

Re: Mysteries of Port behavior and design [message #20564 is a reply to message #20563] Fri, 24 December 2004 12:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18756
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)
Hi Ron,

Group delay is a function of frequency and rolloff slope. So if your bass response extends down very low, group delay will be higher than a speaker with higher cutoff. Most would prefer less group delay, but it is important to realize what it is. I'd rather have 30Hz response with its attendent group delay than 80Hz cutoff with less group delay.

Airspeed through a loudspeaker port is directly related to radiator displacement and port area. So if you are not running a lot of power, you can use a smaller port. The Helmholtz formula doesn't address the issue of port area and air velocity, so it doesn't take into account cases where the port becomes excessively restictive. But unless you're considering very small ports, I wouldn't be concerned with the low power levels you're talking about. This is just a seat of the pants estimate, but I don't think you would have problems with any port size larger than 1/2" if you're only running 1 watt. It's easy enough to check and confirm. There just isn't enough power to generate displacements that would cause you problems.

Wayne

Re: Mysteries of Port behavior and design [message #20571 is a reply to message #20564] Mon, 03 January 2005 09:31 Go to previous message
roncla is currently offline  roncla
Messages: 125
Registered: May 2009
Master
Or just have a larger port size and go aperiodic.
I find Ap ports easier to tune(provided you leave access to the insides) and provide a very tamed impedance curve.
ron

Previous Topic: OOPS - I Meant MCM Tweeter
Next Topic: Wood cone single drivers
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Sep 03 07:20:56 CDT 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest