AudioRoundTable.com: Speaker » Fostex FE166, 167 or 168?

Home » Audio » Speaker » Fostex FE166, 167 or 168?

Show: Today's Messages :: Navigator :: Polls
E-mail to friend

Re: Forget 168 [message #20288 is a reply to message #20287]

Mon, 16 August 2004 12:35

roncla
Messages: 125
Registered: May 2009

Master

The 168ez and the 166 can be used in a TQWT with added series resistance. The drawback is the lowered efficency. I have had the 168ez in a TQWT and even with series resistance the performance was not suited to my taste. The highs are almost painful and the only pratical answer was an EQ curve of sorts and i really dont like passive circuits in the signal path.
I had the FE-166e in a BLH and the performance was exceptional, but i sold it when a friend made me an offer i could not refuse.The FE-167 has a higher Qts and will work in a pipe very well, it can even be used in a BR app but either both the BR and the pipe may still need some series resistance.
ron

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Fostex FE166, 167 or 168? By: West Valley Joe on Sat, 14 August 2004 14:13
		Re: Fostex FE166, 167 or 168? By: roncla on Sat, 14 August 2004 18:00
		Forget 168 By: robertG on Mon, 16 August 2004 12:25
		Re: Forget 168 By: roncla on Mon, 16 August 2004 12:35
		FE167e By: West Valley Joe on Mon, 16 August 2004 14:01
		Re: Forget 168 By: robertG on Mon, 16 August 2004 18:19
		Re: Forget 168 By: roncla on Mon, 16 August 2004 19:34
		Re: Forget 168 By: robertG on Tue, 17 August 2004 09:27

Previous Topic:	Pictures from yesterday's high efficiency spkr listening event
Next Topic:	Martinelli Horns

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Nov 28 14:42:45 CST 2024