Home » Audio » Speaker » Heavy-cones verses light-cones in basshorns
Re: Heavy-cones verses light-cones in basshorns [message #18869 is a reply to message #18868] Sun, 27 August 2006 12:18 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
wunhuanglo is currently offline  wunhuanglo
Messages: 912
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (2nd Degree)
Unless I simply don't understand what you're saying I have a hard time accepting the proposition that high mass necessarily implies low resonance.

Do I interpret your words as comparing similar diameter cones on a beam balance - some impregnated pulp and goop covered cones will be heavier than some thin poly cones for the same diameter? If so, can that necessarily dictate Fs? With the same surround, the same suspension, the same voice coil and former you can expect the mass to determine the Fs, but it doesn't necessarily follow, does it? The heavier cone could just as well be supported by a stiffer suspension and surround making it a higher Fs driver than the lighter cone, no?

It seems to me there has to be a far more complex relationship for there to be a preference; that many other physical parameters have to be considered in addition to mass alone including the combined +/-kX aspect.

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Time delay revisited
Next Topic: Finally the x-over is hooked up
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Nov 30 09:34:56 CST 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest