Home » Audio » Speaker » Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec
Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec [message #18374] |
Sun, 01 January 2006 22:37 |
akhilesh
Messages: 1275 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (3rd Degree) |
|
|
Hi Everyone, I sent my 1978 k-horn AA xovers to Bob Crites, of Arkansas, to upgrade to original spec. bob uses GE polyprop in oil caps, and checks the chokes, etc, to make sure the xover is running to original spec. Well i expected some difference, since they say the original oil caps go bad after 20 years, and mine were 27 years old. The difference was actually quite significant. whereas earlier the k-horns sounded a boit muddled and not very coherent, they now sound really good. THe music seems more coherent, the highs seem a lot better. I really enjoyned listening to thm tonight, driven by a 2a3 SET. TO all who own older -horns, if you havenlt updated the xover, it makes a LARGE difference. -akhilesh
|
|
|
|
|
Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec
By: akhilesh on Sun, 01 January 2006 22:37
|
|
|
Re: Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec
|
|
|
Re: Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec
By: akhilesh on Mon, 02 January 2006 11:09
|
|
|
Re: Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec
|
|
|
Re: Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec
By: akhilesh on Fri, 06 January 2006 11:06
|
|
|
Re: Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec
|
|
|
Re: Updated the crossovers on my K-orns to spec
|
|
|
Tube amps versus SOLID state
By: akhilesh on Sat, 07 January 2006 10:55
|
|
|
Re: Tube amps versus SOLID state
|
|
|
Re: Tube amps versus SOLID state
By: akhilesh on Mon, 09 January 2006 10:37
|
|
|
Re: Tube amps versus SOLID state
|
|
|
Re: Tube amps versus SOLID state
By: akhilesh on Mon, 09 January 2006 14:44
|
|
|
Re: Tube amps versus SOLID state
By: GarMan on Mon, 09 January 2006 14:51
|
|
|
Re: Tube amps versus SOLID state
|
|
|
Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
By: akhilesh on Tue, 10 January 2006 11:05
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
By: akhilesh on Wed, 11 January 2006 11:07
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
By: akhilesh on Wed, 11 January 2006 15:35
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
More on old instruments
|
|
|
Re: More on old instruments
|
|
|
Re: More on old instruments
|
|
|
Re: More on old instruments
|
|
|
History of musical scales
|
|
|
Re: More on old instruments
|
|
|
"Something like plywood cabinets"
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
|
|
|
Cool link Wayne, and esp one para
By: akhilesh on Thu, 12 January 2006 10:37
|
|
|
Re: Cool link Wayne, and esp one para
|
|
|
Parameter shifts
|
|
|
I agree
By: akhilesh on Thu, 12 January 2006 14:48
|
|
|
Re: I agree
|
|
|
Re: Thought experiment & why sonic indistinguishability is not a bad thing
By: akhilesh on Thu, 12 January 2006 10:40
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Nov 29 21:37:32 CST 2024
|