| measurements II [message #17533] |
Sat, 05 February 2005 10:11  |
Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (13th Degree) |
|
|
You know whats funny, I see some exceptionally good empirical science expressed here, and one unifying theme seems to be to shun any hint of subjective analysis; and rightfully so.
However the concept of no fundamental archetype for understanding subjective impressions has always puzzled me and this is why.
As a muscician for many years I will state that when I express a musical concept to another muscician they appear to understand exactly what I mean, and the subsequent discussion also appears to indicate that in fact, they do. Whole musical desicions regarding recording/orchestral arranging/hall construction/ensemble playing; are made based upon these subjective conclusions that appear to be universally understood.
How can that be?
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Get a T-Shirt!
