|
|
|
|
Resonance [message #17167 is a reply to message #17156] |
Sun, 07 November 2004 02:04 |
Mike.e
Messages: 471 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (1st Degree) |
|
|
A unit with higher rate of roll off has worse transient response. I guess because its more reactive over a smaller area.Better>worse response 1st order dipole 2nd order Sealed/horn 4th order Ported 4th/6th order Bandpass 8th+ Bandpass Ports use stored energy to enhance bass output. The air has mass,the method of the port stores energy til 'later'.
When designing bandpass subs,the whole idea of them is loudness,so quality suffers.Cone excursion on bandpass systems are lower than ported and sealed-but the fact is,in the time domain,once started in motion the sound doesnt stop quickly enough on a resonant system
|
|
|
Re: Resonance [message #17169 is a reply to message #17167] |
Sun, 07 November 2004 03:07 |
|
Wayne Parham
Messages: 18787 Registered: January 2001
|
Illuminati (33rd Degree) |
|
|
Hi Mike, Brian Davies made a comment that I thought was telling. He said that given two systems with the same driver, whatever EQ is provided to make the amplitude response equal will make the transient response equal too. So it's probably not an apples and apples thing - If a system is optimized so transient response is improved, it pays for it with less extension. If bass extension is made deeper, whether by acoustic device or electrical EQ, then the transient response will suffer by the same amount. Wayne
|
|
|
Apple+apple [message #17170 is a reply to message #17169] |
Sun, 07 November 2004 04:04 |
Mike.e
Messages: 471 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (1st Degree) |
|
|
This is interesting,ive heard of this. Some people liked to think that EQ was different in some way and wouldnt decrease SQ or make GD worse because its electrical... This also makes sense,with the BP systems,with more EQ applied sound worse.. Personally i WOULD go sealed if i had enough Vd-but only when i had enough(ie not at the moment) Regards Mike.e
|
|
|
|
|
|