Black Hole 5 vs. Sonic Barrier - Any opinions? [message #15125] |
Wed, 09 November 2005 02:01 |
gumby1
Messages: 63 Registered: May 2009
|
Viscount |
|
|
I am planning to build two Rythmik Audio Servo Subwoofers next month. I am considering using either Black Hole 5 from GR Research or Sonic Barrier from Parts Express to line the cabinets. Does anyone have any experience or opinions on these products?
|
|
|
Re: Black Hole 5 vs. Sonic Barrier - Any opinions? [message #15126 is a reply to message #15125] |
Thu, 10 November 2005 00:40 |
Duke
Messages: 297 Registered: May 2009
|
Grand Master |
|
|
I bought some Sonic Barrier once. Maybe I got a bad batch, but the stick-um on it was pretty weak, and it started falling off the enclosure walls before I had finished installing the drivers. Can't comment from experience on the effectiveness of either one in a subwoofer application, but one of the manufacturers I represent uses Black Hole 5 in the "hot-rod" versions of his full-range speakers. In a subwoofer enclosure, I'd be inclined more towards making the enclosure walls super-stiff, to drive the resonant modes above the subwoofer's passband, and then putting some polyfill in the box to eat up residual lower midrange energy. If the crossover is low enough and steep enough, you might not need any polyfill. But I don't think either Black Hole 5 or Sonic Barrier is going to do much at subwoofer frequencies. Duke
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Black Hole 5 vs. Sonic Barrier - Any opinions? [message #15131 is a reply to message #15130] |
Wed, 30 November 2005 21:41 |
gumby1
Messages: 63 Registered: May 2009
|
Viscount |
|
|
Bill, I know your subwoofers are horn loaded, but I am building a sealed cabinet of two cubic feet for servo subwoofers. It might be an "apples and oranges" comparison. I have built speakers in the past using R13 insulation and never noticed a dust issue even after 300 hours of use. Perhaps a subwoofer would cause a breakdown of the fiberglass. I'm not sure.
|
|
|