Home » Audio » Source » Digital Optimized
Re: Digital Compromised [message #14195 is a reply to message #14194] Tue, 08 March 2005 05:11 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
DRC is currently offline  DRC
Messages: 169
Registered: May 2009
Master
Agreed on both.

On digital amps: they have to convert back to analog at some point, unless our brains are going to be modified. We don't listen digitally. And pushing the digital compromise further down the chain doesn't improve things. I listen to some of the best digital front ends on the market every day, and they still suffer a 4-8:1 cost disadvantage compared to analog, and never actually catch up.

A large chunk of higher resolution material (35mm film) has a huge advantage over a sensor 2/3 the size with lower resolution. If you want smoothly graduated grainless tonality, film is still IT. Full sized sensors get you closer. Medium or large format digital backs get you closer still, but now we're up to the price of a subcompact car.

Digital sources and cameras win on convenience and ubiquity. I use my digicam for product shots for the web and trade show coverage. I use film for personal satisfaction. The digits still lose out on quality. IMHO. YMMV.


 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: How important is a pre-amp if your amp has volume pots?
Next Topic: where are the Toshiba SD 3950's?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Aug 12 18:40:39 CDT 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest