Home » Audio » Thermionic Emissions » comparing amplifiers
Re: Some reasons why SETs sound different [message #10840 is a reply to message #10839] |
Fri, 10 December 2004 09:18 |
akhilesh
Messages: 1275 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (3rd Degree) |
|
|
Hi Tom, Any measure of accuracy is fine by me. IF we choose it as what a human hears, then it becomes psychoacoustical, and will vary from person to person. Also keep in mind, the recording one is hearing has already been miked, and encoded. So, maybe you are saying that somehow a SET undoes the effects of the mike-encoded signal, and makes it sound live. I think it simply does the 3 things I mentioned in my earlier post, and makes the music sound better. For example, exaggerated midrange leads to greater presence, lower damping factor leads to more bass (though less controlled) and the distortion leads to a "richness" or fatness in sound. All of these can be interpreted by us as sounding better, and so, by your definition of fidelity a SET is indeed better. I think it's semantics: essentially we are agreeing: a SET will not output the (transformed) input signal as accurately as a SS amp, but it does sound better. BTW, Bob Carver's Sunfire amps actually did a pretty simple thing, his "Current" output speaker terminals simply had a 1 ohm resistor in series, to reduce damping factor. In his ads, he stated that the reduced damping factor accounted for 90% of the tube sound. I am not sure how he reached that conclusion...my own opinion is that increased distortion & frequency curve play a role as well. You are right, one can use standard chips to do many of the things a SET does....including I guess introduce even order distortion. Since I am not an electrical enginner, I will not speculate how one can do that. -akhilesh PS: try having a civil discussion liek this in the asylum....ha
|
|
|
|
|
comparing amplifiers
|
|
|
Re: comparing amplifiers
|
|
|
Re: comparing amplifiers
|
|
|
Re: comparing amplifiers
|
|
|
Re: comparing amplifiers
|
|
|
Re: comparing amplifiers
|
|
|
Re: comparing amplifiers
|
|
|
Re: comparing amplifiers
|
|
|
Carver's Pro Tripath Amp
|
|
|
Re: Carver's Pro Tripath Amp
|
|
|
Re: Carver's Pro Tripath Amp
|
|
|
Re: Carver's Pro Tripath Amp
|
|
|
Re: Carver's Pro Tripath Amp
|
|
|
Re: Carver's Pro Tripath Amp
|
|
|
Re: Carver's Pro Tripath Amp
|
|
|
Re: Carver's Pro Tripath Amp
|
|
|
Re: comparing amplifiers
|
|
|
Re: comparing amplifiers
|
|
|
Re:Building kits is like cooking from a recipe
|
|
|
Some reasons why SETs sound different
By: akhilesh on Wed, 08 December 2004 13:52
|
|
|
Re: Some reasons why SETs sound different
|
|
|
Re: Some reasons why SETs sound different
By: akhilesh on Wed, 08 December 2004 21:02
|
|
|
An alternate take
By: DRCope on Thu, 09 December 2004 09:13
|
|
|
Re: An alternate take
|
|
|
Re: An alternate take
By: akhilesh on Thu, 09 December 2004 14:06
|
|
|
Re: An alternate take
By: DRCope on Thu, 09 December 2004 14:21
|
|
|
Re: An alternate take
|
|
|
Re: An alternate take
|
|
|
Re: An alternate take
By: akhilesh on Thu, 09 December 2004 19:56
|
|
|
Re: Some reasons why SETs sound different
|
|
|
Re: Some reasons why SETs sound different
By: akhilesh on Thu, 09 December 2004 20:09
|
|
|
Re: Some reasons why SETs sound different
|
|
|
Re: Some reasons why SETs sound different
By: akhilesh on Fri, 10 December 2004 09:18
|
|
|
Re: Some reasons why SETs sound different
|
|
|
Re: Some reasons why SETs sound different
By: akhilesh on Fri, 10 December 2004 14:40
|
|
|
Re: Some reasons why SETs sound different
|
|
|
Re: Some reasons why SETs sound different
By: akhilesh on Sat, 11 December 2004 07:54
|
|
|
Re: Some reasons why SETs sound different
|
|
|
Re: Some reasons why SETs sound different
By: akhilesh on Sat, 11 December 2004 17:48
|
|
|
another iimigrant...
|
|
|
Re: Some reasons why SETs sound different
By: Steve on Sun, 23 January 2005 10:12
|
|
|
"good but not great"
By: johnf on Mon, 13 December 2004 20:57
|
|
|
good until....
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Nov 15 11:58:42 CST 2024
|