Home » Audio » Thermionic Emissions » comparing amplifiers
Carver's Pro Tripath Amp [message #10815 is a reply to message #10814] Mon, 06 December 2004 11:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
colinhester is currently offline  colinhester
Messages: 1349
Registered: May 2009
Location: NE Arkansas
Illuminati (3rd Degree)
Looks like there's some serious interest from the "big boys."

Re: Carver's Pro Tripath Amp [message #10816 is a reply to message #10815] Mon, 06 December 2004 12:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
How do you justify 1100$ for a 30$ amp chip? Thats one expensive box.

Re: Carver's Pro Tripath Amp [message #10817 is a reply to message #10816] Mon, 06 December 2004 14:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
colinhester is currently offline  colinhester
Messages: 1349
Registered: May 2009
Location: NE Arkansas
Illuminati (3rd Degree)
Yes, it is a little expensive for a $30 chip. However, what would a 300wpc tube amp cost?!?!?!?Colin

Re: comparing amplifiers [message #10818 is a reply to message #10814] Mon, 06 December 2004 14:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne Parham is currently offline  Wayne Parham
Messages: 18793
Registered: January 2001
Illuminati (33rd Degree)


Re: Carver's Pro Tripath Amp [message #10819 is a reply to message #10817] Tue, 07 December 2004 05:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
Point taken. In AudioeXpress this month, Norman Thagard has parralled 8 Citation 11 tube amps for 480 watts out. What a sight, the whole set-up weighs over 500 lbs.

Re: Carver's Pro Tripath Amp [message #10820 is a reply to message #10819] Tue, 07 December 2004 08:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
colinhester is currently offline  colinhester
Messages: 1349
Registered: May 2009
Location: NE Arkansas
Illuminati (3rd Degree)
I've always enjoyed Dr. Thagard's articles. His amps are always so over the top. My aX has not shown up yet. This article along with the Tand Bang project should make for some good reading. Do you ever look at Tech Talk at Parts Express' site? Those boys are all over TB projects......Colin

Re: Carver's Pro Tripath Amp [message #10822 is a reply to message #10820] Tue, 07 December 2004 16:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
No I will have to check them out. In the article they do some radical stuff such as using a heating iron to dimple the cone. Thagard is something else ain't he? I hold him up to my son as an inspiration.

Some reasons why SETs sound different [message #10823 is a reply to message #10805] Wed, 08 December 2004 13:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
akhilesh is currently offline  akhilesh
Messages: 1275
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (3rd Degree)
HI John & everyone else,
Good post! Here are my 2 cents:
An amplifier should sound different if it offers:
a) a non flat frequency curve
b) appreciable distortion (over 5% to be audible with music)
c) High output impedance, in other words, low damping factor.

Most solid state amps today, even the el-cheapo ones, are pretty much dead flat freq curves, non audible distortion (below 1% usually) and have very low output impedances, along with very high input impedances.

Tube amps: ahhh...they are all different. For example, I did a review of the Stoetkit Jr with the Zen se84c, and the zen se84c seemed a lot clearer, probably becuase it emphasized the midrange more (in other words, not a flat freq curve). Usually, SETs have higher (much higher) distortion than even push pull tube amps, and as they clip this sound can be liekd by some people (esp. guitar players!). Finally, having a low damping factor can artificially increase the bass in single driver speakers, esp. with heavier cones. That is why these speakers sound better with SETs than SS amps.

Which offers greater "fidelity"? I think SS amps for sure. Which is more fun to play with, as long as you don;t care about fidelity, but just want to have fun and listen to music? Tube amps, esp. SETs!

My 2 cents.FYI, I own 3 SETs: one zen se84c, one asusa (el 84 with 12ax7 drivers) and one classic SET 45 tubed (the one I listen to most, and the one that probably measures the worst!)
I also have a solid state Yamaha amp I just bought from the late 1970's: sounds great but no character: kinda like buying a HOnda versus an old MG roadster, if you know what I mean!
-akhilesh


Re: Some reasons why SETs sound different [message #10824 is a reply to message #10823] Wed, 08 December 2004 18:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Manualblock is currently offline  Manualblock
Messages: 4973
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (13th Degree)
Hey AK where ya been? The 45 is the Korneff right?

Re: Some reasons why SETs sound different [message #10825 is a reply to message #10824] Wed, 08 December 2004 21:02 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
akhilesh is currently offline  akhilesh
Messages: 1275
Registered: May 2009
Illuminati (3rd Degree)
HI John,
Just hanging. The 45 is not a korneff but a custom job i bought off the internet. Nice ly done.
-akhilesh

Previous Topic: Really cool DIY Rogue's Gallery I fell over
Next Topic: Stoetkit arrived!
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Dec 22 01:09:13 CST 2024

Sponsoring Organizations

DIY Audio Projects
DIY Audio Projects
OddWatt Audio
OddWatt Audio
Pi Speakers
Pi Speakers
Prosound Shootout
Prosound Shootout
Miller Audio
Miller Audio
Tubes For Amps
TubesForAmps.com

Lone Star Audiofest