THD Definitions [message #1020] |
Mon, 25 October 2004 13:12 |
GarMan
Messages: 960 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (2nd Degree) |
|
|
Hi. Can someone please point me to a resource describing the definition or calucation of THD? Is there currently just one standard definition of THD or has others been introduced which weighs the harmonic orders differently, as well as weighing even and odd harmonics differently. Gar.
|
|
|
|
Has there been proposals for alt THD Definition? [message #1025 is a reply to message #1022] |
Mon, 25 October 2004 14:12 |
GarMan
Messages: 960 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (2nd Degree) |
|
|
Wayne, do you know of any proposals for alternative definition for measurment of Harmonic Distorsion? It is widely accepted that higher order harmonics are more offensive that lower harmonics and odd orders are more evil than even orders. I'm very surprised that tube-guys have not come up with their own weighted definition. I for one believe that measurement has value, but often time, we are not measuring the right things or not measuring them correctly. Gar.
|
|
|
|
Yes [message #1029 is a reply to message #1025] |
Mon, 25 October 2004 20:07 |
Mike.e
Messages: 471 Registered: May 2009
|
Illuminati (1st Degree) |
|
|
Klippel suggested a scheme which increased the values of distortion as frequency rises- i found it on a google search (dont forget to use the advanced search function to search sites individually) Also of note is not just a % figure overall-but how it varies with frequency on transducers,and how class A/b amps although measuring well can have HF artifacts,and class A reduce distortion with lower level more like Valve amps(but are only similar in that respect)Im planning on a 3.1 way active system with Class A eventually Cheers!
|
|
|